Confined Space

Workers Compensation Letters to the Editor

Printed below are letters to the editor of the NY Times in response to the article about the current workers comp article that I wrote about last Monday.

To the Editor:
Re "Cost of Insurance for Work Injuries Soars Across U.S." (front page, June 23):

Fraud is a real problem. Rising medical costs trouble Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance as well as workers' compensation. The insurance industry has only itself to blame for speculative investments and ill-advised premium wars.

But readers should know that large numbers of injured workers never claim compensation, out of ignorance or fear of employer reprisals; employers and insurers systematically reject valid claims, hoping workers will abandon them or accept low settlements; and state laws compensate workers for less than their lost wages (typically two-thirds, with a ceiling); death payments are low (often shockingly); and there is no explicit payment for pain and suffering.

Before we rush to reduce workers' compensation, we must address the fact that it neither compensates nor deters employers from creating unsafe workplaces.

RICHARD L. ABEL
Los Angeles, June 23, 2003
The writer is a professor at U.C.L.A. Law School.
•
To the Editor:
Your report about the soaring cost of workers' compensation insurance (front page, June 23) is yet more evidence that the current malpractice insurance crisis is predominantly a result of the insurance industry and its 10-year roller coaster cycles.

If the sudden substantial premium costs were spread out over a 10-year period, they would look far less remarkable.

While reforming the malpractice system by imposing caps on damages recovery can make the system less costly, the fairness of taming the industry's volatility on the backs of the most seriously injured victims is highly questionable.

Reform of the method by which damages are determined to reduce the substantial variations and extreme awards would be desirable. So would reform of the insurance industry to avoid the cyclical crisis in insurance premiums.

MICHAEL D. GREEN
Winston-Salem, N.C., June 24, 2003
The writer is a professor at Wake Forest University School of Law.
•

To the Editor:

Re "Cost of Insurance for Workplace Injuries Soars Across U.S." (front page, June 23):

Bad labor relations is a component of employee fraud in many cases. Employees who don't like their jobs or their employers are more likely to fake injuries or exaggerate claims than those who are more satisfied with their jobs. Added to this mix are layoffs and pressure from management on fewer workers to produce more. Speeding up the assembly line has a cost.

STEVEN KALOW
Glenmont, N.Y. June 24, 2003
•
To the Editor:

Re your June 23 front-page article about the rising costs of workers' compensation insurance:

The California Legislature deregulated the workers' compensation insurance industry in 1993 at the behest of the state Chamber of Commerce. This action spurred a frenzy of predatory pricing among insurance companies that saved employers $3 billion to $5 billion per year during the mid-to-late 1990's, but also drove more than two dozen insurance companies out of business.

These price wars have ended, rates are skyrocketing, and employers are confronting the repercussions of the free-market reforms they pushed through in 1993. Yet California businesses are trying to attribute higher rates to recent benefit increases for injured workers. In addition, a bill sponsored by the state A.F.L.-C.I.O. to curb excessive rate increases has won no business support.

If the free-market ideologues win the current battle in the California Legislature, it will be injured workers and their families who suffer the consequences.

TOM RANKIN
President, California Labor
Federation, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Sacramento, June 25, 2003

The Weekly Toll

Utility Worker Electrocuted During Maintenance Check

ROCHESUER - Glen A. Hopkins, 41, was electrocuted while performing an annual maintenance check on a high-voltage electrical unit at the Turnkey Landfill on Thursday morning.

Portsmouth man dies from construction accident

YORK, Maine - William Frommer, 49, injured in a construction accident at a local residence died Thursday night at Maine Medical Center. He had been in critical condition after he was pinned beneath collapsed roof rafters 10 days earlier.

Mail carrier shot to death in Ingram

A U.S. postal carrier, Clayton J. Smith, 45, was shot and killed yesterday afternoon as he stood next to his postal van in a shady spot in the Crafton-Ingram Shopping Center, apparently taking a midday break from the heat.

WTC Site Worker Killed
Death in accident is first since 9/11

Hugo Martinez, 36, became the first worker in the rebuilding of the World Trade Center site to die on the job when he was crushed while painting part of a commuter rail station, authorities said.

Martinez was being carried in a construction lift about 20 feet off the ground when he was crushed. He was found dead yesterday morning by other workers.

Construction worker dies in forklift accident

TIGARD -- Noel Lira Sanchez, 32, was killed in a forklift accident at a Bull Mountain home construction site early Monday.

A forklift crane lifting a heavy pallet of lumber and construction products fell forward and hit him.

Worker killed at Rock Hill chemical plant

Emerson Sturgil, a 70-year-old Fountain Inn man was killed early Saturday after authorities say he was struck by a 7-foot-tall metal tank that collapsed at a Rock Hill chemical company. More here.

Construction worker dies of injuries

Sean McDonough, 28, who was pinned under a 300-ton construction crane for more than half an hour Thursday afternoon died yesterday.

OSHA looking into death at truss plant

TAVARES -- The federal Occupational Safety & Health Administration is investigating the death of a 21-year-old Mascotte man who died last week while operating machinery at a Tavares truss plant, authorities said.

Carlos Reyes died Thursday around 11:30 a.m. after getting stuck under a roof-fabrication press at Casmin Inc.'s Tavares plant, according to reports.

Bizarre accident kills construction worker

TIGARD - One man is dead after an accident at a home construction project in Tigard(OR) .

Noe Lira Sanchez was inside the house climbing up a ladder to the roof. At the same time Sanchez was on the ladder, a forklift driver was positioning a pallet of 2-by-6s on the roof.

The heavy load, weighing approximately 3,600 pounds, caused the forklift to become unbalanced. Its back tires came off the ground, and the load shifted forward, pinning Sanchez against the building.

The forklift shifted again, and Sanchez fell 10 to 12 feet to the floor.

Labels: Weekly Toll

Who's to Blame?

Female Corrections Officer Killed

Darla Kay Lathrem, a 38-year-old rookie corrections officer, was
beaten to death with a sledgehammer June 11 by escaping inmates while supervising five male inmates as they worked on dormitory renovations at Charlotte Correctional Institution in Florida.

In an example of profound insight, Governor Jeb Bush stated that "If anyone thinks being a correctional officer is easy work, sadly that's not the case." Nope. Dangerous places. Shit happens. Too bad.

The Governor asked the people not to blame the legislature (or its budget cuts), and presumably not to blame the Governor either. But that wasn't good enough for the Gainesville Sun

And don't go pointing fingers at the $45 million in Department of Corrections budget cuts contained in the new, not-yet-signed state budget. After all, those cuts haven't even kicked in yet.

But what about the cuts already made?

Over the past three years, the Bush administration, in the name of efficiency and to help finance politically popular tax cuts, has reportedly eliminated 1,292 correctional positions. State prisons no longer even keep guards posted in the towers because they are deemed superfluous.

Over that same period, while Bush and the Legislature were "getting tough on crime" by ratcheting up penalties, the state's inmate population increased by 2,320 inmates.

Correctional facilites can probably never be termed totally "safe," but there are always measures that can be taken to make conditions safer: better staffing, "man down" alarms, improved emergency procedures. Much of that takes funding. And if the funding isn't there, there is someone to blame.

We do blame Bush and we do blame the Legislature for making the corrections business more dangerous than ever. These days, the rallying cry in Tallahassee ought to be: Billions for tax cuts, but pennies for public safety.

Workers are From Mars, Environmentalists are From Venus?

Solution: Just Transition

The alleged conflict between people who are tired of polluted air and water and people who need to work for a living -- especially in the energy producing industry -- is as old as the conflict between dogs and cats. And as unnecessary. Do environmentalists and unions need to be on opposing sides fighting over drilling in Alaska, global warming and automobile fuel efficiency standards?

Not necessarily, argues Jim Young in an article about the Just Transition movement in the Sierra Club magazine.

Just Transition "advocates financial support, health care, and retraining for employees displaced by environmental regulation, and would be funded by a tax on pollution." And how does that work?

One recent transition proposal calls for two years of full, unconditional wage replacement and up to four years of full-time training or educational benefits, stipends for another two years for those who remain in training, health insurance, and retirement contributions. The proposal estimates its cost would average $122,000 per worker, or about 150 percent of the average amount lost by a dislocated worker. The taxÂ–on fossil-fuel production and energy-intensive manufacturingÂ–plus a small surcharge on nuclear and hydroelectric power, would be phased in over a five-year period, increasing to $50 per ton of carbon emitted, roughly equal to 13 cents per gallon of gasoline.

Costly? Perhaps, but why should workers be the only ones to pay (with their jobs) for a clean environment that benefits everyone?

It's supported by the Blue/Green Working Group, which includes the United Steelworkers of America, District 11; the Service Employees International Union; and the Union of Needletrades, Industrial, and Textile Employees (UNITE!). It is led on the environmental side by the Sierra Club and the Union of Concerned Scientists.

It won't be easy, but ultimately, it's the only way we will protect the environment, workers' livelihoods AND put workers and environmentalists on the same side where they belong.

Keep The Stolen Loot, Just Try Not To Let It Happen Again

That apparently is what the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is telling the nation's largest power companies as they "today rejected a request by California to invalidate more than $12 billion in energy contracts signed at the height of the state's electricity crisis, even though they have determined that widespread manipulation helped drive prices higher. "

The reasoning?

The two commissioners who voted to sustain the contracts, Patrick Wood III and Nora Brownell, both appointees of President Bush, said the state had failed to meet a high standard of proof that would allow for such drastic action.

Mr. Wood said that voiding the contracts was not in the public interest and noted that California officials had said at the time the contracts were signed that they were good deals for the state.

Yeah, well if someone had a knife to my throat, saying "Your money or your life," I'd probably consider it a very "good deal" to give him my wallet. But that doesn't mean that the thief doesn't have to give it back when he's caught.

In addition, the Commission

found that while manipulation helped drive prices higher, the root cause of the crisis was the state's deeply flawed deregulation plan and a severe shortage of electricity. Taken together, the two factors made possible many of the abuses that later occurred, commission officials have said.

So if I accidentally leave my back door open and someone robs me, they don't have to return the loot when they get caught?

I remember when Republicans wanted to be known as the law and order party. That must have been back when they thought the sky would fall if we didn't balance the federal budget.

BACK TO THE YELLOWSTONE AGE

From The Daily Grist

The Bush administration has asked the United Nations to remove Yellowstone National Park from a list of endangered World Heritage sites. "Yellowstone is no longer in danger," wrote the Interior Department's Paul Hoffman in a letter to the World Heritage Committee. There's just one snag: The park staff disagree with Hoffman, saying Yellowstone still faces the kinds of problems -- threats to water quality, bison, and trout populations, among others -- that put it on the endangered list in the first place, back in 1995. But in its recent report to the U.N. committee, the Bush administration diluted or deleted those problems, in a move critics say is emblematic of White House efforts to water down, sugarcoat, or deny environmental problems across the board. "Tinkering with scientific information, either striking it from reports or altering it, is becoming a pattern of behavior," said former National Park Service Director Roger Kennedy.

Chemical Industry Steps Up To the Plate...And Strikes Out

The most effective weapon of mass destruction ever used in the United States was the commercial airliner, with the assistance of a few boxcutters. One way to effectively address that threat would have been to eliminate the source: ban airplanes from the skies. But that probably would have generated some public opposition, So the next best action was to heighten security at the gate (more guns, better inspections, etc.) so that no passenger has the means to hijack a plane.

With chemical plants, however, where the "right" accident could kill many more people than died on 9/11, the situation is different. On one had we can't eliminate chemical plants. But on the other hand, we can (unlike air travel) eliminate much of that hazard at its source by replacing highly hazardous chemicals or processes with less hazardous chemicals or processes, or by storing smaller quantities of hazardous chemicals on site. These and other measures form the basis of what is known as "inherently safer" production. One advantage of this method is that it not only minimizes the effectiveness of any terrorist incident. A bigger advantage is that it also minimizes the existing day-to-day threat of catastrophic chemical plant accidents that may be caused by management system errors or equipment failure.

So it was rather disconcerting to read about a recent chemical plant security summit attended by the largest chemical manufacturers and associations.

Throughout the day, industry leaders agreed, conceding that many of their largest and most dangerous facilities still lack armed guards, perimeter fencing or even nighttime patrols.

But they also insist they have upgraded protections for their workers and neighbors. Dozens of companies told about adding lights, barbed wire, hiring round-the-clock guards and, in a few instances, even substituting less-dangerous chemicals for toxic chemicals.(emphasis added)

Note what is listed last (and probably least) It's not that the attendees don't understand the threat from terrorism. The problem is that they seem to ignore the fact that the hazardous chemicals and unsafe conditions at many of these plants present the same level of threat to U.S. citizens as exists after 9/11 and will continue to exist even if Al Qaeda and their brethren are eliminated. Accidents happen, and as long as the potential is there, we are all at risk. Bhopal, remember, was not a result of terrorism.

An unprecedented national Chemical Security Summit in Philadelphia wrapped up Thursday, with federal counterterrorism experts and corporate executives insisting that, while much has been done to improve security, more must be done, quickly, to protect citizens from terrorists seeking to turn chemical tanks into the "poor man's atomic bomb."

"You've heard about sarin and other chemical weapons in the news. But it's far easier to attack a rail car full of toxic industrial chemicals than it is to compromise the security of a military base and obtain these materials," said FBI Special Agent Troy Morgan, a weapons-of-mass-destruction specialist who spoke at the summit.

Corporate and government leaders worry that terrorist cells could unleash toxins on a major American city -- a disaster that could rival the Bhopal, India, industrial accident that killed more than 20,000 in 1984.

The chief culprits stalling faster reforms, executives and federal counterterrorism experts agree, are a corporate culture that embraces slow, incremental changes rather than sweeping innovations, and an economic downturn that's left little cash for security.

But nothing is likely to be done about the concept of inherently safer production if the American Chemical Council has its way:

The ACC represents the interests of the nation's largest chemical manufacturers on Capitol Hill. In October, it spearheaded a successful drive to crush the Chemical Security Act, a bill that would have federalized securing at nearly 13,000 sites nationwide. Key to the bill was a measure forcing major manufacturers to shift production to "inherently safer" materials and technologies. Without federal legislation, chemical security is being addressed by the new Department of Homeland Security.

I've written previously here, here and here about the legislative battles -- Jon Corzine's bill (S. 157) which requires the chemical industry to consider inherently safer technologies vs. Senator James Inhofe's (D-OK) bill which pretty much leaves it up to voluntary efforts by the chemical industry, its slow corporate culture and the economic downturn.

Congress will soon be bringing up the issue again. Unfortunately, given who is in control and has the largest lobbying budget, the prospects for Corzine's bill are not good -- unless the public decides that eliminating the potential for a "poor man's atomic bomb" at the source will make them feel more secure than more armed guards and higher barbed-wire fences. And then making their opinions known to their Congressional representatives.

Labels: Chemical Plant Security

CSB Releases Nitrogen Hazard Bulletin

The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board released a new safety bulletin that presents a series of good safety practices to prevent nitrogen-related incidents. Asphyxiations, many of which occurred in confined spaces, cause 80 fatalities in the U.S. over the last decade. In addition to the full safety bulletin, the CSB has developed a one-page safety brochure and a downloadable Powerpoint® presentation on nitrogen hazards.

As part of this project, the CSB reviewed a number of nitrogen asphyxiation incidents that have occurred in the past decade. Findings from this study included the following:

85 incidents occurred in the past decade that resulted in an average of 8 deaths and 5 injuries each year;

Causes of the incidents included personnel not knowing they were entering an oxygen-depleted environment or not realizing that the environment had changed, and also mistaking nitrogen gas for breathing air;

Incidents occurred in a variety of settings including chemical plants, food processing and storage facilities, laboratories, and medical facilities;

Almost half the incidents and over 60% of the fatalities involved contractors, including construction workers;

A number of deaths were caused by personnel attempting rescue without proper training and equipment.

Labels: Chemical Safety Board

Daubert, Junk Science and Polluters

Back when I was at OSHA working on ergonomics, the biggest argument we had with opponents of the regulation were allegations by the business associations and conservative Republicans that ergonomics was based on “junk science.” The argument was put most forcefully by soon-to-be Labor Department Solicitor Eugene Scalia who claimed in an article that OSHA was violating the “Daubert Decision.”

Today, a group of experts in the legal and scientific community released a report entitled "Daubert: The Most Influential Supreme Court Ruling You've Never Heard Of" (Full Report here.)

Daubert was originally intended to assist judges in determining what evidence could be admitted into a trial. But as the authors explain:

The 1993 Daubert ruling directed federal judges to act as "gatekeepers" in the courtroom, using a standard that requires expert testimony to be both reliable and relevant before allowing it to be presented to juries. However, over the past 10 years, some judges have misinterpreted and broadened the reach of Daubert. Some have excluded scientific opinions when there is (or appears to be) disagreement among legitimate scientists; while others pick apart each piece of the scientific evidence presented by an expert rather than assessing the evidence as a whole, the way scientists do.

What this means is that when corporate attorneys manage to cloud the science and confuse the judges, the evidence gets labeled as “junk science” and good cases often get dismissed by the judge before they even get to a jury. Victims of toxic chemicals and drugs are the losers.

Or, as in the case of ergonomics, the “junk science” argument is used to obstruct the regulatory process.

One example of how Daubert has kept legitimate science out of the courtroom came from Peter Infante, former director of OSHA’s Office of Standards Review. He was prevented from testifying in Chambers v. Exxon Corp., a lawsuit involving a contractor at an oil refinery in Baton Rouge who was exposed to benzene and then developed chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), a rare form of cancer. He was to have testified as the author of a 1977 study that confirmed that benzene caused leukemia and as the author of a later analysis that found a four-fold increase in the risk of developing CML from exposure to benzene.

But the judge excluded his testimony (saying it wasn’t strong enough) and issued a summary judgment in favor of the defendant. Dr. Infante said the judge not only made a factual error – his analysis was the first to show a more than two-fold increase in risk plus statistical significance – he asked for more than anyone else in the field would have required for such a rare disease. Benzene was considered a cause of leukemia, including CML, long before any epidemiological study showed a two-fold increase in risk.

"It seems to me the judge was making a scientific determination when he didn’t have the expertise to do that," Dr. Infante said. “It’s a matter of fairness. A worker wasn’t protected from toxic exposure, from a chemical known to cause a disease. He was damaged by the product, and his case wasn’t allowed to get to a jury.”

So what is to be done about this problem? Beyond "becoming aware," or getting better judges (by getting rid of you-know-who) that's not entirely clear.

On the tenth anniversary of Daubert, the scientific community needs to become
much more aware that an obscure procedural decision intended to provide clarity has instead given rise to a serious social imbalance. It has led to unreasonable legal demands of scientific certainty when considering expert testimony that right otherwise demonstrate harm of individual plaintiffs by defendants, often wealthy and powerful companies. At the same time, inappropriate or inaccurate interpretations of science are becoming embedded in legal precedent. Yet in contrast, Daubert has failed to demand from criminal prosecutors better science in the face of weak forensic methods, resulting in the potential conviction of innocent people. And now, the application of Daubert and Daubert-like challenges threaten to paralyze the systems we use to protect public health and the environment.

Labels: Ergonomics

One Big Sector

Harold Meyerson ponders how a bunch of low-paid, immigrant, janitors are gaining health care benefits while the rest of America watches their health care benefits fade away or become unaffordable.

If this runs counter to everything you know about power in America, you probably have forgotten about unions. At minimum, you have forgotten about unions that organize so many workers in a single sector that those workers can win some real power over the conditions of their work.

Meyerson lavishes praise on unions like SEIU, UNITE and the Hotel and Restaurant workers who are working hard to organize and maximize bargaining power in their hard-to-organize sectors rather than go for the easy members like public employees (as some unions are doing.)

Meanwhile, In a Parallel Universe, Somewhere in the Midwest....

John Ashcroft and his Washington acolytes may be winning their war against ~~unions~~ terrorism inside the Beltway (See below), but somewhere in the heartland live a whole bunch of ~~union~~ terrorist sympathizers.

In Jefferson, Wisconsin, UFCW Local 538 is on strike against Tysons Foods. But in these allegedly anti-union times, the people of Jefferson are sticking with the union.

A gas station owner "gave strikers and their families 328 gallons of milk from the Shell station and convenience store he co-owns on the south side"
The Citgo station near the factory gate keeps its bathrooms open for the pickets.
Many merchants, including d.b. Puffins restaurant, offer discounts for the strikers.
Oak Ridge Golf Course in Milton charges no green fees for the union members on Tuesdays.
The Jefferson Jaycees and Capn's Corner catering recently raised $3,500 for the strikers, serving 600 chicken and fish dinners in the rain at the park next to the factory.
Local eateries, including Subway, promote that their food is "Tyson-free."
Ken's Towne Inn gives pickets leftovers from catering jobs
Because of the strike, the credit union is letting its members defer loan payments.

It's like a bygone era, back when "compassion" still meant something:

"These workers have supported me for 21 years in this community," Dave Lorbecki, owner of Dave's Piggly Wiggly says. Sticking up for the workers has brought him more customers, he says, but like at other businesses, his sales are down because those shoppers have less money to spend.

Lorbecki is part of a campaign to keep a Wal-Mart SuperCenter from coming to Jefferson, and he hopes boosterism for the strikers spills over to that cause.

"This really woke people up to what community spirit is all about," Lorbecki says.

What explains all of the support? According to the article,

the strike has provided citizens here with a rallying point through which they can rail against the inevitable encroachment of global capitalism.

"Railing against the encroachment of global capitalism? Solidarity? If there's any more of that out there, can we bottle it and use it in the next presidential election?

Another Victory Over Terrorism

Well, we may not have been able to find Osama bin Laden, Sadaam Hussein, or weapons of mass destruction, but we're succeeding in the fight against terrorism on another front: smashing unions.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is considering plans to exempt from collective bargaining 600 inspectors who have been represented by a union for more than 30 years.

ATF employees are represented by the National Treasury Employees Union, which is widely known to have a close personal relationship with Al Qaeda.

Or at least that's what Tom Ridge and Dick Cheney seem to think. And they know stuff.

Of course, this wasn't the first victory of the Bushniks over the evil federal unions

In January 2002, lawyers for the NTEU and the Justice Department were in Miami for a hearing on whether the union could organize assistant U.S. attorneys in three Florida cities. Before the union lawyers got to argue their case, President Bush issued an executive order citing national security concerns and kicking unions out of U.S. attorney offices and four other divisions of Justice.

Union leaders were outraged. Previous presidents had removed unions from federal agencies by citing national security concerns, but the labor leaders said no president had stopped litigation over collective bargaining rights by invoking national security.

Paging John Sweeney. Your one-way flight to Guantanemo is ready to board.

Home of the Fearful, Land of the Imprisoned

The Justice Department Inspector General has found that U.S. authorities overreacted toward immigrants in the wake of 9/11.

These truck drivers, bus boys, janitors, and cabbies have no connection to terror. But their lives are ruined and families shattered because they have the bad luck to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

So, maybe now things will get better? Hah! These are the Ashcroft times.

One would hope that the recent disclosures of government excesses and apologies by security officials would be a sign that the post-Sept. 11 panic is over and more rational investigative measures that actually prevent terrorism are being implemented. Unfortunately with Operation Landmark, the Special Registration program, and the presidential campaign centered on the themes of national security, it looks like the worst is yet to come.

Workers Comp Fraud

The New York Times article that I highlighted in yesterday's posting about the growing crisis in the workers compensation system contained the following paragraph describing some of the causes of the problem

Prices are escalating, government and industry officials said, because of rising medical and legal costs; a recent devastating price war by insurers; and, many insurers and business executives say, a significant amount of fraud.

What kind of fraud you ask? Well, I'm pretty sure that the insurers and business executives are not talking about the most common and expensive type of workers compensation fraud: Employer fraud.

According to a 1998 article, "Fraud in the Workers' Compensation System: Origin and Magnitude"* by Dr. David Michaels, currently at George Washington University,

In states where the relative importance of worker and employer fraud can be compared, it is apparent that the magnitude of employer fraud greatly exceed that of worker fraud.

And what is "employer fraud?"

It's avoiding insurance payments by underreporting payrolls, manipulating injury and claims data to show move favorable claims experience...and improperly using independent contractor status ...to avoid workers compensation insurance..

But if employer fraud is so much more common and costly than worker fraud, why do we always seem to hear anecdotes and television stories about scandals involving workers, allegedly seriously injured on the job, filmed taking out the garbage? Sexier television or is there an ulterior motive? According to Michaels,

Employers and insurance carriers know that the campaigns against worker fraud rarely identify many actual cases of outright fraud, and they save little or no money In fact, they may lose money. Their primary purpose is not to save money. High profile campaigns that focus primarily on worker fraud are actually public relations campaigns to convince the public and legislators of the demonstrably false asssertion that the workers compensation system is rife with worker fraud. Once this occurs:
The public and legislators become more accepting of "reforms" that significantly reduce benefits paid to disabled workers; and

workers injured on the job become concerned that they will be stigmatized by neighbors and coworkers if they file legitimate compensation claims. To avoid this stigma, injured workers shift the medical costs of their claims to their group health insurance policies and pay the cost of lost wages themselves, through their accrued sick days and vacation leave, and continue to work while injured.

The winners? Insurance carriers who don't have to pay claims, and employers who don't have their premiums raised. The losers? Workers and their families who bear the costs themselves; other workers, because the employer has even less incentive to make the workplace safe, and of course, taxpayers who ultimately end up paying the bills.

Last week I cited Lisa Cullen's article, "Safety Pays, Or Does It?" about how safety doesn't really pay for those who are able to work the system so that workers and society end up paying the real costs of unsafe workplaces.

Legislatures in many states will be seeking to "reform" the workers compensation system in the near future. And they'll be using worker fraud as an excuse. Print out this article and save it for the upcoming battles.

*Occupational Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, Vol 13, No.2, April-June 1998, Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, Inc.

Labels: Workers Compensation

Asbestos Compensation Update

Good article on the continuing struggle in Congress over a decent asbestos compensation bill. This is what it's all about: "Between 1965 and 1999, at least 259,000 people died from asbestos-related diseases such as mesothelioma, as well as lung and gastrointestinal cancer. From 1999 to 2030, experts predict an additional 166,000 deaths connected to asbestos."

Labels: Asbestos

Workers Compensation Crisis

Solution: Screw the Workers (What else?)

The nation-wide workers compensation crisis has hit the big time, if "big time" is measured by its placement in the NY Times. In this case, it's front-page, right hand column news. Its description of the crises is good, the analysis, however, is a bit thin.

Read the article. I only have a few comments, but I'd like to invite any workers comp experts out there in internet land to donate your analysis to be read by the tens of thousands (plus or minus tens of thousands) of Confined Space readers. E-mail me here and I'll be happy to reprint your comments.

First:

Across the country, the cost of workers' compensation insurance is soaring at the highest rate in nearly a decade, adding yet another heavy burden on businesses and the struggling national economy.

Any effect on workers? You wouldn't know it by the number of labor union experts that were quoted (none). But then, why should workers be concerned? The real issues is the profit loss column of the workers comp insurance companies.

There's your requisite bit of job blackmail:

"The only way to reduce your cost is to reduce your payroll," said Allan Zaremberg, the president of the California Chamber of Commerce.

An attempt at analysis:

Part of the problem has been created by the insurers and the boom-and-bust cycle of their industry.

In the mid-90's, expenses for workers' compensation insurers dipped and profits skyrocketed just as the stock and bond markets were at their most exuberant.

Actually, if you talk to many workers comp experts, this was more cause than coincidence. Like many Americans, workers comp companies decided they could make more money in the stock market than from premiums. They invested heavily in stocks, and cut their rates to attract new customers. They, like millions of other Americans, lost their shirts when the stock market crashed, leaving them with no money and rates too low to cover their obligations. Oops. Better raise rates to cover their bad investments, and pressure legislators to cut workers' benefits.

One factor, of course, is the rising cost of medical care. This requires a comprehensive nation-wide solution (like maybe single-payer universal health care?) . In the meantime, it seems to be much easier to hit workers on both ends: raise their health insurance premiums or cut their coverage on one end, then reduce their workers comp benefits on the other.

Another cause mentioned by the article: fraud. The natural inclincation for most people when the word "fraud" is mentioned is to think of workers claiming false injuries. You have to read until the very end of the NY Times article to understand what fraud really means.

According to California Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi:

"There's fraud in every part of this situation," Mr. Garamendi said. "You have a situation where doctors and lawyers and chiropractors are involved in organized crime and ripping off the system. You have workers faking injuries, and you have companies not reporting the nature or the number of their employees," whose jobs are an important factor in determining how much the employer pays. "It's not unusual to see a roofing company paying premiums for one roofer and 30 secretaries."

In fact, most good studies of workers compensation fraud find that fraud by workers is by far the smallest portion.

Hey, I have a another good idea: We could make sure that workers don't get hurt in the first place.

More later (with your help.)

Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid

This headline in the Washington Post didn't start my day off very well:

GOP Aims for Dominance in '04 Race
Republicans to Seek Governing Majority by Feeding Base, Courting New Voters

Most of the actual article wasn't much better:

Republican strategists see the 2004 election as their best opportunity in a generation to construct a durable governing majority, and they have set in motion a systematic and coordinated strategy designed to leverage President Bush's popularity and break the impasse that has dominated the country's politics since the mid-1990s.

On the other hand, there were signs of hope:

Signs of Close Election

There are good reasons for Bush strategists to anticipate a close election. Given the unsettled state of the world and the still-weak economy, a second Bush term is far from assured -- let alone the goal of making Republicans the country's majority party.

Early polls show Bush receiving the support of less than 50 percent of the public when matched against a generic Democratic nominee. That is far below his approval rating, suggesting a wait-and-see attitude on the part of many voters.

Economic problems could derail hopes for a second Bush term just as quickly as they did for his father in 1992. "If we're below about 2 percent real growth, this [election] could degenerate into a dogfight," said former House speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.). "If we're in a recession, this will be a dogfight. If we're above 2 percent real growth, I just think the Democrats are in a world of hurt."

Instability in Iraq, questions about whether Bush or other administration officials misled the public about the threat of weapons of mass destruction, violence in the Middle East and continued fears about terrorist attacks at home threaten claims of success in foreign policy. That could transform one of Bush's clearest advantages into an arena for challenge by the Democrats.

I like the "wait and see attitude." People with a "wait and see attitude" are open to a little "show and tell." That's where we come in.

Question of the Week

Why does my pop-up stopper stop all pop-up ads except for ads for pop-up stoppers?

The Weekly Toll

Worker dies when found gun discharges

NEW YORK (AP) _ A construction worker died after a shotgun he found in a trash container at a work site accidentally discharged, striking him in the neck, police said.

Orano Stepcic, 52, found the gun in a case he pulled from a container near where he was working on Woodward Avenue in the Ridgewood section of Queens on Friday morning, police said. More here.

Farm worker dies after gate accident

TOWN OF IRVING, Wis. — A 19-year-old farm worker died after getting caught in a mechanical cattle gate Friday morning, according to the Jackson County Sheriff's Office.

Megan L. Queitzsch of Melrose was rushed to Black River Memorial Hospital from a farm on Sunnyvale Road in the town of Irving after the accident was reported about 9:15 a.m. She wasprono unced dead at the hospital, according to a sheriff's press release.

Man working on light switch is electrocuted

A 19-year-old worker, Duane R. Smith, was electrocuted Wednesday while trying to wire a light switch at a Columbia home, Richland County Coroner Gary Watts said.

Explosion claims fairgrounds worker

An adult male employee of the Ozark Empire Fairgrounds was killed Wednesday in an explosion at the fairgrounds, an investigator with the Greene County Medical Examiner's Office said.

Officials identified the victim as Brad Murphy, 34, of Springfield. No other injuries were reported. More here.

Late-night blast at Houston company under investigation

SAN LEON — One worker was killed and four others were hospitalized early Wednesday after a late-night explosion at an offshore gas-drilling rig in upper Galveston Bay.

Houston-based Transocean Inc. said 21 workers were rescued from its gas-drilling barge after the blast was reported about 11 p.m. Tuesday.

Safe door collapses, killing Livermore man

A 31-year-old Livermore man was killed Tuesday at a construction site near the International Marketplace when the door of a walk-in safe he was tearing down collapsed on him.

The coroner's office identified him as Sathaniel Malachai Menzie. He worked for Soil Enterprises Inc. of Byron. More here.

PUC employee killed by trash compactor

A Pacific Union College employee was killed Monday when he apparentl y was crushed to death in a trash compactor.

Nelson Rivera, 39, was found dead by co-workers at the college's landfill at 12:45 p.m., sheriff's Capt. Mike Loughran said.

More here and here.

Investigation begins into building collapse that killed one worker

Officials have begun investigating the partial collapse of a downtown building that killed a construction worker.

Adam Petruska, 20, of Kent County was crushed under tons of rubble Wednesday morning. He was working inside the 70-year-old Welsh Civic Auditorium which is scheduled for demolition. More here.

Memphis Firefighters Died as Heroes

MEMPHIS -- Two firefighters died braving fire and smoke in a three-alarm fire at a Frayser business, believing they were going in to save trapped civilians, fire officials said Monday.

However, reports that people were inside the burning Family Dollar store at 3732 Watkins proved untrue.

As both experienced firefighters searched for victims Sunday night, a portion of the roof collapsed, trapping them.

Lt. Trent Kirk, an 11-year Fire Department veteran, died inside the store after urging other firefighters to retreat.

It was several hours after the collapse that a rescue team knocked a hole in the north wall of the building to pull him out.

Firefighter Charles Zachary, a 19-year veteran, was pulled from the blaze after 15 minutes, Fire Director Chester Anderson said. He died of his injuries early Monday.

Labels: Weekly Toll

Dust to Ashes

The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) held a public hearing Wednesday to present preliminary findings of its investigation into the catastrophic explosion at West Phamaceuticals last January.

West Pharmaceutical Services created conditions for the deadly blast at its Kinston plant by installing a suspended ceiling that allowed explosive dust to build up out of sight, federal investigators said at a public hearing Wednesday night.

The explosion, which killed six people and injured three dozen others, was strong enough to buckle six-inch-thick concrete floors, fling walls and create a column of black smoke visible for miles. The plant was left a peeled skeleton.

The CSB is also investigating another explosion caused by dust at a factory in Corbin, KY that killed 7 workers.

OSHA has a regulation to prevent grain dust explosions, but otherwise does not address the hazards of explosive dusts. Some experts fear that we may be seeing more catastrophic dust explosions becauses advances in technology are resulting in finer and more explosive dust particles.

More information on the West meeting here, here, here, here and here.

Labels: Chemical Safety Board

The Best Laid Plans....

One of the less well thought-out "homeland security" programs seems to have faded into a well-deserved oblivion.

Government officials said today that both the civilian and military smallpox vaccination programs had virtually come to a halt, the military program because it has vaccinated everyone it can and the civilian program because few people volunteered for it.

Fear of side effects and ignoring compensation issues for health care workers were two strikes against the program.

Personally, I never did see any convincing evidence that there was any threat from smallpox in the first place. But what did I know? I didn't think that Iraq was an imminent threat to the security of the United States and...oh yeah, it wasn't.

Now, as we learn more and more about the lies we were told to justify the invasion of Iraq, one can't help but wonder if the whole smallpox scare was just another Bush administrated ploy to sow more fear throughout the land. Naa!

PESTICIDE OR SPERMICIDE?

(from Grist Magazine)

Frogs and men, beware: Pesticides are your enemy. Men exposed to pesticides commonly used on crops are far more likely to have defective sperm and low sperm counts than men who are not exposed, according to a study published yesterday in Environmental Health Perspectives. The study is the first to show a link between environmental toxins in men's bodies and poor sperm count and quality. The study is also important because it involved men who did not work on or live next to farms, meaning they were most likely exposed to the pesticides through drinking water.

Of the three pesticides tested -- alachlor, diazinon, and atrazine -- the latter (which is the most common one in the U.S.) is also to blame for sexual abnormality in frogs, according to the U.S. EPA. The agency called for more research to understand the exact impact of atrazine on the frogs; to date, different studies have shown that it results in multiple reproductive organs and hermaphroditism.

More information here and here.

Job Opening: New EPA Administrator; Ostrich Wanted

The Bush administration seems to think if it sticks its head in the sand, global warming will just go away:

Report by the E.P.A. Leaves Out Data on Climate Change

The Environmental Protection Agency is preparing to publish a draft report next week on the state of the environment, but after editing by the White House, a long section describing risks from rising global temperatures has been whittled to a few noncommittal paragraphs

***

The editing eliminated references to many studies concluding that warming is at least partly caused by rising concentrations of smokestack and tail-pipe emissions and could threaten health and ecosystems.

Among the deletions were conclusions about the likely human contribution to warming from a 2001 report on climate by the National Research Council that the White House had commissioned and that President Bush had endorsed in speeches that year. White House officials also deleted a reference to a 1999 study showing that global temperatures had risen sharply in the previous decade compared with the last 1,000 years. In its place, administration officials added a reference to a new study, partly financed by the American Petroleum Institute, questioning that conclusion.

In the end, E.P.A. staff members, after discussions with administration officials, said they decided to delete the entire discussion to avoid criticism that they were selectively filtering science to suit policy.

Yeah, wouldn't want anyone to think you were filtering science to suit policy. Wouldn't be prudent.

OSHA Takes Front Stage in Congress

Tuesday seemed to be OSHA Day on Capitol Hill.

On one side of the Capitol, Senator Jon Corzine(D-NJ), flanked by his House counterpart Representative Major Owens (D-NY), introduced S. 1272, the “Wrongful Death Accountability Act” that would among other things, increase the maximum criminal penalty from six months to 10 years in prison for those who willfully violate workplace safety laws and cause the death of an employee.

Evoking the senseless deaths and injuries at McWane Industries, Corzine appeared at his press conference with Pamela Coxe, widow of Alfred E. "Alfie" Coxe.

Coxe was killed three years ago at the Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Co. in Phillipsburg. He was run over by a forklift. His widow has filed a lawsuit against the corporate parent, McWane Inc. of Birmingham, Ala.

"McWane just wants the profit ... I'm left picking up the pieces. I don't have a husband. My son doesn't have a father," Coxe said.

In his statement introducing the legislation, Corzine noted that

Unbelievably, under existing law, that crime is a misdemeanor, and carries a maximum prison sentence of just 6 months. This legislation would increase the penalty for this most egregious workplace crime to 10 years--making it a felony. The bill also would increase the penalty associated with lying to an OSHA inspector from 6 months to 1 year, and would increase the penalty for illegally giving advance warning of an upcoming inspection from 6 months to 2 years.

Meanwhile, on the other side of Capitol, moving full speed in reverse, Congressman Charlie Norwood (R-GA) was holding a hearing on his bill, H.R. 1583, Occupational Safety and Health-Fairness Act of 2003, which allegedly "promotes fairness for small business owners who are making good faith efforts to comply with all health and safety laws," but actually will make it harder for OSHA to issue a "willful" citation by changing the definition of a willful violation so that an employer’s “good faith belief in the legality in its conduct” will have more weight than the employer’s knowledge that he or she is violating the law. The definition would also be changed so a violation would not be considered willful if the violation didn’t actually place an employee in harm’s way.

This was the usual Republican version of a balanced hearing: John Molovich of the Steelworkers, "balanced" by a witness from the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB), one from the Chamber of Commerce and one small business owner on his own.

The hearing began with the traditional Republican OSHA bashing ceremony. In his opening statement, Norwood, a former dentist who has never forgiven OSHA for killing the tooth fairy, complained that

"OSHA regulations are among the most complex and difficult legal requirements imposed on employers today…Many workplace safety and health standards involve understanding very sophisticated technologies. For many employers -- especially smaller employers -- compliance with OSHA regulations is challenging, even with help from experts."

Now, read this carefully. Norwood isn’t saying here that OSHA is being arbitrary or unfair in its enforcement. He’s complaining about the alleged complexity of OSHA standards. So, assuming that OSHA regulations are not just a bunch of busy work and actually have some relationship to keeping the workplace safe, Norwood is actually saying that health and safety is far too complicated and expensive for small employers. Bad luck for the people who work there.

This statement brought back painful memories of a ridiculous speech that Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao gave last year to the NFIB (them again.) She had brought along a large stack of federal regulations. Pointing at them, she said:

I’ve brought a piece of that regulatory jungle here with me today.

This big stack is just a few of the labor laws and regulations that you are expected to comply with. You know this—you have to face this every day. I wonder how many of us in government really realize the burden we are asking you to shoulder. Is this the most effective way to protect workers?!

There are more words in the Federal Register describing OSHA regulations than there are words in the Bible. They’re a lot less inspiring to read… and a lot harder to understand!

This is not fair.

It’s not fair that you are expected to know every rule and regulation without any decent help from the people who write them, promulgate them, and penalize you if you aren’t abiding by them!

It’s not fair to you, and it’s not fair to the American worker

So, according to the Secretary of Labor of the United States, it's unfair to expect employers to follow the law.

Let's all remember one thing. It isn't about OSHA or OSHA regulations any more than DUI laws are about the police. It's about the safety of workers. When you start a business, you have a responsibility to run it safely, according to the law -- the same law that applies to all employers, big or small. OSHA's only there to make sure employers follow the law and don't take shortcuts that kill workers, the same reason that the cops are there to make sure no one drives drunk, gambling that they'll get home OK without killing my kids.

Safety Pays?

The NFIB witness, Brian Landon, owner of Landon's Car Wash (and professional OSHA witness) told the same old tired story:

First of all, we certainly would not want to see family members or friends injured. Secondly, from a business perspective, it just makes sense to avoid injuries.

Now, I think it's be useful to look a bit more closely at these statements because we hear them over and over again at every OSHA hearing from small and large business owners.

Don't get me wrong. I truly believe that Landon doesn't want to kill his employees. No one wants to injure or kill their employees. None of these employers wanted these workers to die.

But they also didn't want to go the extra mile to make their workplaces safe. The problem is that left to their own devices, workplace safety becomes a cost-benefit equation, a pact with the devil. "I'll just cut a bit on the safety here and there and hope my luck holds out and nothing happens." Someone who drinks too much, then drives home and kills a family of five didn’t want to kill the family; he was gambling that his luck would hold out.

And does safety pay? Interesting question. We use it to sell the idea that health and safety regulations are win-win situations – good for workers and good for businesses. I spent a lot of time at OSHA gathering and communicating information about how the using good ergonomic principles have saved businesses money.

They use the "safety pays" mantra to argue that we don't need no stinkin' OSHA regulations and penalties because any good business owner knows that "safety pays." Or they should know. So all we have to do is educate them. Fact sheets, guidelines, consultations, partnerships are all that are needed. Unless and until someone kills a bunch of workers. Then, and only then, we might consider a citation -- but not too much and don't put them in jail. Accidents happen.

Of course, in the real world we also know that safety does not always pay -- for the employers. Sure, worker injuries and deaths cost the American economy hundreds of billions every year and it's costly and embarassing for individual employers when someone is actually injured or killed.

But who really pays most of the financial cost of workplace injuries, illnesses and death? (We know who pays the real costs in injury, illness and death.)

Lisa Cullen, author of A Job To Die For, wrote an article for the Synergist entitled "Safety Pays, Or Does It?" in which she notes that McWane had recklessly injured and killed scores of workers for years without hurting its bottom line. Cullen notes that “In addition to the McWane example, there is stronger proof that safety and health does not always pay.”

We often use and hear the national cost estimate of $170 billion for occupational injuries and illnesses annually. Less well known but equally important is the cost allocation. In the book Costs of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, the expert team of J. Paul Leigh et al. found that workers’ compensation covered roughly 27 percent of all costs; taxpayers paid approximately 18 percent through Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security; and injured workers and their families paid 44 percent of the costs. If employers are not paying for most—perhaps as much as two-thirds— of their employees’ injuries and illnesses, then on a national level there is no pressing financial incentive to improve workplace safety and health. One cannot argue that safety pays to someone not paying for it to begin with.

The bottom line is that it doesn't matter if safety "pays" or not. It doesn't matter if it's complicated and difficult to make some workplaces safe. What matters is that 6,000 workers are killed in the workplace every year; over 50,000 die from occupational diseases and more than 5 million are injured. We need a strong OSHA to make workplaces safe every bit as much as we need cops to make our streets safe.

So, as the USWA's John Molovich testified, instead of passing Norwood's bill that will further weaken OSHA, we need to pass laws that will make OSHA stronger. We need to pass Corzine's bill that will increase criminal penalties. And we need to improve whistleblower protection, pass an ergonomics standard and increase OSHA's budget. There's lots of work to be done.

Labels: Charlie Norwood

Comic Relief:

We interrupt this Blog for a humorous interlude. We all need to laugh sometimes. This story has been floating around the internet. Senator Orin Hatch (R-UT) has suggested figuring out a way to destroy the computers of people who illegally download music. I kid you not:

During a discussion on methods to frustrate computer users who illegally exchange music and movie files over the Internet, Hatch asked technology executives about ways to damage computers involved in such file trading. Legal experts have said any such attack would violate federal anti-hacking laws.

"No one is interested in destroying anyone's computer," replied Randy Saaf of MediaDefender Inc., a secretive Los Angeles company that builds technology to disrupt music downloads. One technique deliberately downloads pirated material very slowly so other users can't.

"I'm interested," Hatch interrupted. He said damaging someone's computer "may be the only way you can teach somebody about copyrights."

The senator acknowledged Congress would have to enact an exemption for copyright owners from liability for damaging computers. He endorsed technology that would twice warn a computer user about illegal online behavior, "then destroy their computer."

This could be dangerous. What if the government was able to find and destroy every computer that contained the words "Bush Sucks?"

Deadly Jewelry

There is increasing evidence, pointed out in several articles in the NY Times over the past several months, that for Chinese workers, "Made in China" means "Dead in China:"

SHUANG TU, China, June 15 — With his handsome smile and full head of black hair, Hu Zhiguo hardly looks 44, much less gravely ill. The giveaway is his wispy voice, faint from clotted lungs.
One doctor told him he had tuberculosis. Another guessed it was cancer. The final diagnosis, based on the cumulus of gray that clouds his chest X-rays, is a severe case of silicosis, a disease Chinese workers call dust lung.

Mr. Hu got the illness making cheap necklaces and bracelets from iridescent stones like opal, sold by the containerload to United States retailers. Working long days at a factory in booming Guangdong Province, he probably inhaled more quartz dust in 10 years than China's own safety standards would permit in a thousand.

****

China in that sense is not only recreating the industrial transformation that brought prosperity to Europe, the United States and some East Asian nations. It is also reliving its horrors.

Even by its official count, China already has more deaths from work-related illnesses than any other country or region, including the industrialized economies of the United States and Europe combined.

Last year, 386,645 Chinese workers died of occupational illnesses, according to government data compiled by the International Labor Organization.

The statistics may understate the situation in China's thriving east coast industrial centers, where tens of millions of migrant workers like Mr. Hu produce the bulk of China's exports for well under a dollar an hour without employment contracts, health care plans or union representation.

More Ergo Follies

And the hits just keep on coming.

Correction: Dr. Szabo, mentioned in this article, was not an author of the study, but only an "expert" quoted by the Post. More on this study later.

Linked here is a Washington Post article about a study allegedly showing that "Frequent on-the-job use of a computer keyboard does not pose a major risk for carpal tunnel syndrome, according to the largest study of the topic to date. The findings were published June 11 in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)." According to the author of the study, Dr. Robert Szabo, surgeon and professor of orthopedic surgery at the University of California, Davis, School of Medicine,

"Computers causing [carpal tunnel syndrome] was a myth. No science has ever shown that any medical disorders are caused by using a keyboard," he said. "This is finally coming out in the mainstream."

While the article notes that he "sat on a seminal National Academy of Sciences panel on musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace in 2001," it doesn't mention that Szabo was the lone dissenter of the panel, the rest of whose members strongly supported the connection between working conditions and musculoskeletal disorders.

On the other hand, according to the Post,

David M. Rempel, a professor of occupational medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine and also a member of the National Academy of Sciences panel, says this level of use was insufficient to draw conclusions about either keyboard or mouse use. Usage under 20 hours a week, says Rempel, is not representative of people who do data entry or design for a living.

"The conclusions you can draw there are pretty limited," said Rempel. "What about graphic artists and reporters, who might be exposed to their computers for 20, 30 or 40 hours a week?"

In addition, said Rempel, the study didn't address any of a range of other ailments he said can result from prolonged computer use. These, he said, include tendinitis of the wrist and elbow -- inflammatory conditions often accompanied by stiffness, soreness and pain -- as well as trapezius muscle strain, which causes soreness around the shoulder blade; the latter condition can often be remedied by changing positions to better support the forearm. Prolonged computer use, said Rempel, will cause approximately 10 to 15 percent of workers to develop wrist tendinitis; 30 percent can expect trapezius muscle strain. "All eyes are on carpal tunnel syndrome, but we need to look at the whole gamut of problems that can come from repeated computer use," he said.

Szabo's dissent from the NAS study was highlighted in March 2001 Congressional testimony by the anti-labor LPA favoring repeal of the OSHA ergonomics standard.

According to the LPA, Szabo

criticized the panel for using inaccurate scientific literature, particularly regarding carpal tunnel syndrome. He highlighted the studies that indicated that personal factors, age, lifestyle and sex as more predictive of carpal tunnel syndrome than job exposure....Taken as a whole, the evidence cited by Dr. Szabo with respect to carpal tunnel syndrome casts doubt on the remainder of the NAS conclusions.

In a response to Szabo's dissent, members of the NAS panel accused him of misinterpreting some studies and using others that "did not meet the quality criteria (insufficient participation and inadequate exposure measures were common problems) used by the panel in selecting articles for the epidemiology review and so are not included in the report."

I think after a few more decades of study, we can possibly start to consider the advisability of thinking about the potential merits of an OSHA standard. Or maybe not.

Labels: Ergonomics

A Little Bit of Home in Baghdad

Remember how Bush said he wanted to bring universal health care and a quality educational system to Iraq? Well, according to a new report by U.S. Labor Against the War, we're bringing another little part of America to Iraq: Corporations with sordid records

marked by fraud, price-gouging, wage-cheating, deception, corruption, health and safety violations, human and labor rights abuses, union-busting, strike-breaking, environmental contamination, malpractice, and collusion with dictators.

The report, titled "The Corporate Invasion of Iraq: Profiles of US Corporations Awarded Contracts in US/British Occupied Iraq," is intended to provide much needed information to Iraqi workers and their resurgent labor movement about the US companies that are their new employers.

According to U.S.L.A.W, "A strong, independent, free and democratic labor movement and respect for workers and human rights must be an essential pillar of a new democratic Iraq."

We've heard a lot about the no-bid contracts awarded to Halliburton, Dick Cheney's old stomping ground. Yet it turns out that a large number of corporations chosen by the Bush Administration to rebuild Iraq are

firms whose workers have no unions; several have well-established records of hostility toward unions and workers who seek to organize them. Some of the largest contracts issued by the Bush administration for work in Iraq have been issued without competitive bidding to firms with inside connections to the administration. Many have past and present associations with the Bush administration through business or political relationships or elected and appointed government positions that give them privileged access in their dealings with the government.

In addition to Halliburton, the report describes, for example: notoriously anti-union Stevedoring Services of America, DynCorp, which has been implicated in drug-running and prostitution scandals, fraud and environmental crimes and Flour, which has also had a number of environmental and labor "problems."

In fact all 18 corporations profiled are model corporate citizens, aside from a few flaws like

cost overruns, accounting irregularities, financial dereliction, fraud, bankruptcy, overcharging, price-gouging, profiteering, wage-cheating, deception, corruption, health and safety violations, worker and community exploitation, human and labor rights abuses (including use of forced labor), union-busting, strike-breaking, environmental contamination, ecological irresponsibility, malpractice, criminal prosecutions, civil law suits, privatization of public resources, collusion with dictators, trading with regimes in violation of international sanctions, drug-running, prostitution, excessive executive compensation, and breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders and the public.

The bottom line, according to U.S.L.A.W., is that if the U.S. is really serious about building a progressive society in Iraq,

nothing could be more important to the welfare of Iraqi workers and their families than having the right to organize, bargain collectively and, if necessary, strike to defend themselves and advance their interests against these corporations. This applies not only to fighting for decent wages and working conditions but also for making sure that the Iraqi people, not foreign corporations, control the resources and economic future of their country.

And I have now doubt that this is exactly what George Bush and Don Rumsfeld have in mind as they work toward their goal of a union-free U.S. government.

He Lies, He Scores!

Lots and lots of information about Bush's shameless lies and more lies -- about Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction, about tax cuts, and on and on.

More depressing, especially about WMDs, is that people don't even seem to care. Or maybe, thanks to our excellent media, THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW HE'S LYING! Click on that link. It's really scary. It therefore falls upon those of us who know the truth to enlighten the uninformed masses. It's your responsibility. Don't waste time.

And this is a good opportunity to encourage you to read the Good Political Blogs (Weblogs) I have linked on the left side of this page. They not only provide excellent analysis that you don't generally get in the press, but they link to some of the more important articles in newspapers around the country, as well as to other Blogs. Check them out.

Democracy in America

Just in case you were still under the impression that all views can be expressed and voted on the U.S. Congress, the Washington Post describes how democracy, as interpreted by Rules Committee Chair David Dreier (R-CA), really works:

On many high-profile issues, Dreier, whose committee decides the rules for each debate, has refused to allow Democrats an opportunity to offer a substitute amendment on the House floor. He has infuriated Democrats by denying them votes on their plans for everything from unemployment insurance to tax cuts.

This may sound like inside baseball, but it has a huge impact on what bills pass the House and become laws.

By preventing Democrats from offering amendments, Republicans virtually eliminate the possibility of the House passing legislation not endorsed or written by GOP leaders. As important, they eliminate a key opportunity for Democrats to divide Republicans by writing alternative bills that might appeal to moderate Republicans. Republicans also protect their members from swing districts from having to vote for or against some bills that could hurt them politically in the next election.

Dislaimer: I went to college with Dave Dreier. The only thing I remember about him was that he was one of the only two people I knew in my class (and possibly in the entire college) that wore a tie to class every day. This was the early '70's. Hell, back then, some people didn't even wear clothes to class.

Happy Fathers Day: The Weekly Toll

A few fathers who won't be spending Fathers Day with their children. Just a few of the roughly 125 workers who were killed on the job last week.

Worker Killed in Fireworks Incident

Aaron Speciale, 27, a Utica pyrotechnician died early Saturday after he was hurt while lighting fireworks fuses with a flare after a Syracuse SkyChiefs game at P&C Stadium, city police said.

Speciale suffered head injuries when one of the fireworks exploded on the ground at 12:10 a.m. in an empty lot off 4th North St., about 300 yards behind the stadium’s right-center field.

California Man Crushed in Recyling Plant

A man died Saturday night after being crushed at the recycling plant where he worked, authorities said.

The accident happened when Adalberto Gonzalez, 52, of Sacramento, was unloading a bin full of aluminum cans from the back of a truck to a conveyor belt at Smurfit-Stone Recycling, said the Sacramento County Coroner's Office

Food Plant Worker Killed in Meat-Processing Machine.

Daniel Cruz Romero, 34, died Friday. He was killed after being caught in a meat-processing machine at Michael Angelo's Gourmet Foods in northern Travis County.

Romero had complained to a former co-worker he was having trouble with the machine.

Police said his entire body went through the machine. More here and here and here.

Man Crushed by Dump Truck

Onondaga County Waste Management worker Michael White was killed June 12 when he was pinned between his dump truck and the pay loader. More here.

Worker Crushed by Asphalt Grinder

Robert Bourgeois, 43, was killed Thursday night at Hanscom Field during a re-paving project in the parking lot of the airport's Civil Air Terminal.

Worker Electrocuted Restoring Power

Curtis Peterson Jr., 44, A Nashville Electric Service lineman was electrocuted while trying to restore power to a home in the Joelton community Wednesday night, NES officials said.

Man Killed in Forklift Incident

Mervin Charles, 35, of New Orleans was killed in the accident Wednesday about 8 a.m. at Northrop Grumman's Avondale shipyard, after backing his forklift into an opening in a ship. More here.

Safety Inspector Dies in Fall

Georgia Southern University safety inspector Dennis Spradlin died after he was injured while inspecting a campus building on Monday through a hole that had been cut in the floor of decking for the installation of ventilation ducts or plumbing.

Employee Killed By Fumes

Allan Erickson, an employee of a Summit business died after possibly being overcome by fumes, officials said Tuesday.

The incident occurred Monday at TAC tanks, 7745 W. 59th St. in the south suburb, said Summit Fire Marshal Robert Wasko.

Worker dies in fall

Scott Callender, 37, a Plymouth construction worker died June 9 after suffering head injuries from a 23-foot fall at a Central Street work site.

Labels: Weekly Toll

Gettelfinger: Free Trade = Death

Well, not quite, but UAW President Ron Gettelfinger makes the connection between free trade policies and deteriorating working conditions:

Gettelfinger characterized free-trade policies that allow production work to go to the lowest international bidder as a "race to the bottom."

"The winner gets the lowest wages, the fewest environmental and safety protections and few, if any, labor rights," Gettelfinger said. "That's a race that we as a nation shouldn't have to compete in, because there are no winners except for corporate greed."

You get down in that hole there boy and I don't want to see any attitude...

...or maybe we'll arrange a little visit by the I.N.S.

DIAMOND BAR -- A man killed when a trench he was working in collapsed on him was identified Wednesday by a Los Angeles County Coroner's official as Salvador Blanco Orozco, 22, of Hacienda Heights.

Orozco was working in the trench Monday at a housing development in Diamond Bar when he was trapped in the cave-in, Los Angeles County Fire officials said.

The roughly 13-foot-deep trench was dug to house a retaining wall, but the dirt was not properly shored up by wooden supports, said Susan Gard, a spokeswoman for the California Health and Occupational Safety Administration.

Cal-OSHA and the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office is investigating the death, Gard said.

A and C Construction, which hired Orozco, did not have the proper permit to dig the trench, she said.

"It seems like the sheriff's department is interested in pursuing it criminally,' she said.

About time.

Labels: Trench Hazards

Death by Work

This is an article from Le Monde Diplomatique about chewing up workers and spitting them out -- dead or alive, but without the pensions they've worked for. And we wonder why they're mad? (The translation is a bit rough. I looked it up: exaction means extortion.)

US Nurses Take Note: Coming to a Hospital Near You?

Two articles from Toronto about the failure of hospitals to provide proper safety equipment and procedures to nurses exposed to patients with SARS.

Ontario's Labour Ministry has ordered two hospitals to improve their SARS equipment, training and other standards after an investigation found they violated the province's workplace health and safety act.

For front-line health-care workers like nurses, the ministry's findings add fuel and credence to their complaints that many workers are working under potentially dangerous and unstable conditions.

And unions representing health-care providers said the ministry orders may just be the beginning of a slew of crackdowns that the government has to follow through on to protect the health of workers.

"We have to find better ways of providing the protective equipment that's required for utmost safety of our workers," said Adeline Falk-Rafael, president of the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario.

"The complaints I've heard most are that the masks they're supposed to wear to protect them (from SARS germs) aren't fitting, and our advice has been to them not to work in SARS units and with patients if they don't fit properly."

And one more that talks about union action:

At least two nurses at a hospital in Newmarket weren't in full protective gear during a highly contagious intubation, a nurses' union spokeswoman said today as Ontario announced a review of how the province has handled SARS....

Barb Wahl, president of the nurses' association, said although nurses have a duty to work where a hospital assigns them, they can refuse to comply under the Occupational Health and Safety Act. One nurse at North York General Hospital went home with full pay last weekend after refusing to wear a mask that didn't fit her properly, added Wahl.

Wahl said that association demands that all masks be tested for their effectiveness in keeping SARS germs at bay haven't been met. The masks of 25 nurses at St. Michael's Hospital — one of the four hospitals designated to handle the bulk of SARS cases in the Toronto area — were tested twice in the past week, and none passed the so-called "fit test," Wahl said.

More SARS Nurses

Yet another article on the toll that SARS is taking on nurses. According to one nurse, "It is scary to think even right now in the hospital alone, we have 16 people admitted to the SARS unit and 12 of those are our own staff"

More on Corzine Bill

Two articles Senator John Corzine's (D-NJ) "Wrongful Death" bill here and here, which I wrote about earlier this week. The second article is about support for Corzine's bill from the widow of a man killed at Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Co., a division of McWane Industries which was the focus of a Frontline/NY Times article last January.

Bill Moyers: Our American History

Linked here is a speech by Bill Moyers, "This is Your Story - The Progressive Story of America. Pass It On," delivered at last week's "Take Back America" conference.

He talks about the populists of the 1890's:

Furious words from rural men and women who were traditionally conservative and whose memories of taming the frontier were fresh and personal. But in their fury they invoked an American tradition as powerful as frontier individualism – the war on inequality and especially on the role that government played in promoting and preserving inequality by favoring the rich.

And the progressives like our heroine, Alice Hamilton

They include wonderful characters like Dr. Alice Hamilton, a pioneer in industrially-caused diseases, who spent long years clambering up and down ladders in factories and mineshafts – in long skirts! – tracking down the unsafe toxic substances that sickened the workers whom she would track right into their sickbeds to get leads and tip-offs on where to hunt.

And condemns the Conservatives of today whose "stated and open aim is to change how America is governed - to strip from government all its functions except those that reward their rich and privileged benefactors. "

He admits to being

puzzled as to why, with right wing wrecking crews blasting away at social benefits once considered invulnerable, Democrats are fearful of being branded "class warriors" in a war the other side started and is determined to win. I don't get why conceding your opponent's premises and fighting on his turf isn't the sure-fire prescription for irrelevance and ultimately obsolescence. But I confess as well that I don't know how to resolve the social issues that have driven wedges into your ranks. And I don't know how to reconfigure democratic politics to fit into an age of soundbites and polling dominated by a media oligarchy whose corporate journalists are neutered and whose right-wing publicists have no shame.

But ends on a more positive, energizing note:

And finally: Ideas have power – as long as they are not frozen in doctrine. But ideas need legs. The eight-hour day, the minimum wage, the conservation of natural resources and the protection of our air, water, and land, women's rights and civil rights, free trade unions, Social Security and a civil service based on merit – all these were launched as citizen's movements and won the endorsement of the political class only after long struggles and in the face of bitter opposition and sneering attacks. It's just a fact: Democracy doesn't work without citizen activism and participation, starting at the community. Trickle down politics doesn't work much better than trickle down economics. It's also a fact that civilization happens because we don't leave things to other people. What's right and good doesn't come naturally. You have to stand up and fight for it – as if the cause depends on you, because it does. Allow yourself that conceit - to believe that the flame of democracy will never go out as long as there's one candle in your hand.

So go for it. Never mind the odds.

We've been here before and we've won important struggles to take back America. It's a valuable history lesson. Read it. Print it out. Save it. Learn it. Teach it to your children As Moyers said: "This is your story – the progressive story of America. Pass it on."

SARS: View from a Hospital in Toronto

This is a letter from a surgeon in Toronto about SARS: the utlimate hospital hazard:

SARS is an unusual illness. It is a hospital illness. In Toronto, the only place you are going to get it is when you step into a hospital, or if you step into the bedroom of someone who just came home from hospital. This illness specifically attacks the health care system. Virtually all cases are Health Care workers, patients admitted for another illness or visitors of patients.

SARS is much more than a bad case of the flu.

This illness is severe. We have for example 2 health care workers in their early 30's who've been on ventilator for up to 8 weeks. Both of them at times have required inotropic support. It is nothing short of a miracle that they are still alive. Knowing that this can happen to a 31 year old makes a 47 year old surgeon a little nervous.

A short reminder of some of the simplist -- and most easily overlooked -- infection control techniques -- and a tribute to the forgotten, but vitally important floor cleaners and other mainenance an custodial personnel:

I'll admit that in the past I didn't always wash my hands between patient encounters. If there was no internal exam and it was just a quick listen to the lungs and look at a clean wound..... Well the first thing you should learn is wash your hands frequently and well. I use so much of those alcohol based washes, I smell like a drunk. I also go out of my way to be nice to the floor cleaners. They are the people who are most key to ending this outbreak.

But on a brighter note:

I encourage you to visit Toronto. The Canadian dollar is cheap. The hotels are empty and the streets are safe. Even the waiters in fancy restaurants are nice now that they are starving for business. As long as you don't develop a perforated ulcer and require hospitalization you won't get SARS.

Nurses: Understaffing, Back Injuries, Violence and Now SARS

Every time I talk to a nurse about her or his working conditions, I marvel at the dedication to their jobs that gives them the courage and stamina to go to work every day. What strikes me most is that so many of them love their work, but often hate their jobs, or they hate the working conditions -- understaffing, constant heavy lifting, the threat of violence, the fear of communicable diseases -- that keep them from doing their jobs with the compassion and professionalism that they are capable of.

I also remember well the early days of AIDS when no one knew what caused it or exactly how it was transmitted or how to protect oneself -- and one's family. When we had to fight with hospitals to get the training and equipment that health care workers needed. When we had to fight with OSHA and the CDC to get them to listen to front line nurses' concerns and not just dismiss them, or assume that the public health "professionals" knew best. At that time, lots of workers -- doctors, corrections officers, food workers, teachers -- were scared, but on the front lines, with the most exposures, were always nurses. Now, as this Washington Post article describes, we're seeing many of the same issues with SARS.

The latest medical reports show that nurses are more likely to catch SARS than doctors, possibly because they work much more closely and over longer periods with SARS patients. About 8 percent to 15 percent of people who catch SARS die, and people who are 50 and older appear to be at higher risk of dying than younger people. The average age of nurses in the United States is 47.

Some hospitals are doing much better than others training nurses and providing them with the appropriate, properly fitted respirators and other equipment. But as was the case in the early days of AIDS (actually, not just the early days), the union was where those workers had to turn, not only for information, but for a voice. SEIU has a fact sheet for health care workers, and information is also available on the AFSCME web site.

Labels: Workplace Violence

"Unpreventable Employee Misconduct'' Caused Death of Two Workers

Yet another addition to the list of ridiculous employer defenses.

This is the story of two Iowa workers, Daniel Grashoof, 25 and Brian Buford, 19 who were working in a 15 foot-deep trench last summer when they were overcome by fumes and drowned in more than a foot of water at the bottom of the trench. Last fall, Iowa OSHA cited the city of Chesterfield and its contractor, Instuform Technologies for failure to monitor the air, ventilate the area or provide ladders and tether to help rescue the men. Twenty citations were issued against the company, totally $808,250. The City was fined $9,000.

Instuform is now challenging the citation. Their excuse: The company's attorney charged that the asphyxiation deaths of two workers "were the result of unpreventable employee misconduct.''

IOSHA OSHA attorney, Gail Sheridan-Lucht, said the company still had a duty to make sure employees understood training measures. "These deaths should never have occurred,'' she said. "They were totally preventable.''

IOSHA also said "air monitors that would have warned them of the gas were found at the scene, but apparently weren't in use."

Imagine if Charlie Norwood's (R-GA) “Occupational Safety and Health- Fairness Act of 2003” passes with its requirement that OSHA citations would have to take into consideration “the degree of responsibility or culpability for the violation of the employer, the employees, and/or other persons” as well as the “good faith of the employer.”

OSHA probably would have cited the workers' families instead of the company.

Labels: Trench Hazards

Unions Petition OSHA to Revise Process Safety Standard

Eight labor unions, the Building and Construction Trades Department of the AFL-CIO and the AFL-CIO itself petitioned OSHA yesterday to amend the Process Safety Management Standard (PSM) to strengthen its coverage of reactive chemicals. The petition follows a September 17, 2002 report by the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB), which called on OSHA to make improvements in the PSM standard to help prevent additional reactive incidents.

According to the CSB's Reactives study,

Safely conducting chemical reactions is a core competency of the chemical manufacturing industry. However, chemical reactions can rapidly release large quantities of heat, energy, and gaseous byproducts. Uncontrolled reactions have led to serious explosions, fires, and toxic emissions. The impacts may be severe in terms of death and injury to people, damage to physical property, and effects on the environment.

The CSB Report pointed out serious deficiencies in the PSM standard. It called reactive chemical incidents a "significant chemical safety problem," and said the incidents have the potential for occurring at a wide range of worksites and "can severely affect workers and the public, as well as cause major economic losses and environmental damage."

Based on a review of limited data available, the CSB identified 167 reactive incidents between 1980 and 2001, resulting in 108 fatalities. Since 1993, when the PSM standard became effective, there have been at least 92 reactive chemical incidents.

The petition also called on OSHA to remove the exemption from PSM coverage of atmospheric storage tanks. The CSB also recommended that OSHA make this change in its October 2002 Motiva Report. OSHA has not yet made a substantive response to either recommendation.

The press conference held yesterday included a number of labor officials, as well as several survivors of reactive chemical disasters that killed many of their co-workers. The entire press packet and testimony by the workers can be found here.

The Clean Water Action Project and the Working Group on Community Right-to-Know, the Sierra Club, and the Natural Resource Defense Council also issued a statement supporting the labor petition and calling on EPA to revise its Risk Management Planning program as recommended by the Chemical Safety Board.

Five unions originally petitioned OSHA for a revised PSM standard in 1995 following an explosion and fire that year that claimed five lives at a Lodi, New Jersey plant. Under the Clinton Administration, OSHA had planned to issue an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to collect additional information on reactive chemical hazards as a first step toward revising the standard.

In December 2001, however, OSHA withdrew the proposed ANPR from the regulatory agenda because of “resource constraints and other priorities.” In a Special Report, Bush Administration Kills Safety Regulation Opposed by Donors, the Center for Public Integrity documented opposition and pressure from three industry trade groups – the American Chemical Council, the American Petroleum Institute and the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Association. According to the Center, “Employees of those groups and their member companies, and their political action committees, contributed more than $216,000 to Bush's presidential campaign.”

The Chemical Safety Board, OSHA and the EPA will cosponsor a roundtable discussion, today, June 10 to focus on regulatory avenues for controlling reactive hazards. The roundtable will bring together stakeholders from industry, labor, academia, government, and other organizations to discuss how EPA and OSHA might expand their regulatory coverage of reactive hazards, as recommended by the Chemical Safety Board. Three of the petitioning unions—PACE, UNITE and the ICWUC—will speak at the roundtable session.

Labels: Chemical Safety Board

CORZINE CALLS FOR SEVERE PUNISHMENT OF EMPLOYERS WHO VIOLATE SAFETY LAWS

Senator John Corzine (D-NJ) announced today his intention to "introduce legislation to increase criminal penalties for employers who willfully violate safety laws." Corzine's “Wrongful Death Accountability Act’’ would "increase the maximum penalty for willfully ignoring workplace safety regulations from six months jail to 10 years imprisonment."

According to Corzine,

employees have a fundamental right to a safe work environment, and more needs to be done to ensure that businesses that deliberately put the lives of their workers at risk are held accountable for their actions

Currently OSHA can refer cases to federal prosecutors, but the penalties are so small that prosecuters are reluctant to invest the resources needed to successfully prosecute a case. Corzine noted that OSHA criminal statues have not been updated since the 1970s.

Labels: Criminal Prosecution

Let Them Eat Yellowcake

An upsetting story in the Sunday New York Times about the continuing horrors bestowed on the Iraqi people by the United States' failure to occupy and guard facilities that stored nuclear materials.

In Tuwaitha, the electricity went out and the water pumps didn't work. People needed water containers and those shiny ones from behind the barbed wire fence were available.

For nearly three weeks, hundreds of villagers who live in the shadow of the high earthen berm and barbed wire fences that surrounded the labyrinth of the Iraqi nuclear program here bathed in and ingested water laced with radioactive contaminants from the barrels.

The barrels, Iraqi and foreign experts say, had held uranium ores, low-enriched uranium "yellowcake," nuclear sludge and other byproducts of Mr. Hussein's nuclear research.

Some villagers fell ill with nausea. Others developed rashes that made them itch.

Although no qualified medical experts have examined them, some contracted ailments that they now attribute to radioactive contamination. It may take years to determine the health effects from the radiation poisoning that occurred here before American military forces arrived to seal off this nuclear complex.

Aside from the personal tragedy that may afflict the people of Tuwaitha for the rest of their lives, Washington's failure to secure these sites also has security implications.

Questions have been raised by international inspectors about why, despite Washington's assurances that allied forces had secured this facility, an army of looters roamed here freely for days, ransacking vaults and warehouses that contained ample radioactive poisons that could be used to manufacture an inestimable quantity of so-called dirty bombs.

I could have sworn that Bush and Rummy and Powell said that the reason we invaded Iraq had something to do with preventing terrorists from getting weapons of mass destruction. But, I'm getting older and my memory isn't as good as it used to be. We sure did a good job of securing those oil fields though. And didn't George the W look spiffy in his flight suit?

OSHA Announces New Grant Program: Get it While it Lasts.

The Bush Administration keeps trying to euthanize its worker training grant program. For the past couple of years, the White House has persistently attempted to cut OSHA's worker training grant program from $11 million to $4 million. And every year the Congress has put the full $11 million back into OSHA's budget.

The dance continues for the FY 2004 budget and who knows how it will turn out this time around? Tax cuts for the wealthy seem to be more desirable for this Administration than helping workers understand how to come home from work alive and healthy.

So apply now, before the money disappears. Details here.

Blue - Green Alliance Lives

Labor unions and environmentalists have been having some rough times with some unions arguing full steam for oil drilling in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge and against vehicle emission standards. So it's nice to see them working together in a coalition known as the Apollo Alliance.

Ten labor unions, including the steelworkers and auto workers, urged presidential candidates yesterday to back a 10-year, $300 billion research plan that would promote energy efficiency, reduce dependence on foreign oil and preserve manufacturing jobs....

The plan calls for more financing for high-speed rail and fuel-cell technology, for building pipelines and storage facilities to support hydrogen-powered cars and for expanding the use of solar and wind power.

Check out their website here.

Rumsfeld: Unions, We don't need no stinkin' unions! Part II

It's not enough to have crushed Sadaam, now he's taking on John Sweeney and Bobby Harnage as well.

Appearing before the Senate Committee on Government Affairs, Rumsfeld testified in favor of a new administration proposal that would prohibit all 720,000 of the Defense Department's civilian employees from engaging in collective bargaining. The plan passed the House virtually intact last week and is now up for Senate approval.

Rumsfeld argued that the requirements of the war on terrorism make it necessary for the Pentagon to be able to waive clauses of U.S. government code that protect collective-bargaining rights and appeals processes. The bill would allow the defense secretary to prevent employees from filing appeals after being fired and from registering their collective-bargaining organizations. It would also end congressional oversight of Pentagon hiring, firing and personnel practices.

I think we need to get rid of these guys at the first opportunity.

How Much is that Advert in the Paper?

Progressive (liberal) Democrats are meeting in Washington to plan an agenda to take on Bush by actually being an opposition party, in direct opposion to the Republican-lite Democratic Leadership Council. This is good, needed and long overdue. One thing pisses me off though. From the Washington Post:

The sniping began with the opening of the conference Wednesday when a liberal group placed an ad in the New York Times attacking the DLC and its founder and CEO, Al From, and Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.), the presidential candidate closest to the organization. The ad attacked the DLC as a tool of Fortune 500 companies, hostile to unions and too pro-defense.

Now check out this article by Michael Tomasky from an August 2002 article in the American Prospect:

The fact that this [propaganda] imbalance exists, however, is partly the Democrats' fault. Democrats don't have the money Republicans have, and they never will. They can never match Republicans dollar-for-dollar on message creation and dissemination. That said, it's also true that they have not set up the structures to do that. Republican backers slowly and methodically set out to build those structures in the 1970s, knowing full well that they wouldn't bear fruit for a generation or two. Democratic money people, and party leaders, have not been as engaged in such long-term thinking. As one leading Democrat told me not long ago, they'd rather spend their money on a full-page ad in the Times than seed and water a long-range, partisan strategy group or think tank. Accordingly, Democrats have developed no organic relationship with the intellectuals and activists on their side, while Republicans have.

So, yes, the "democratic wing" of the Democratic party may be right and the DLC may be wrong, but why do we have to keep spending the money we don't have to piss on our wayward bretheren, rather than using it to fight the real enemy? How much did that NY Times ad cost, and how could that money have been more usefully spent?

Rumsfeld: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Civil Service Rules

From Suburban Guerrilla:

Rumsfeld says the DoD needs more flexibility in hiring, firing and managing its civilian work force. Well, sure. Because those pesky requirements for things like decent working conditions and a living wage just get in the way of offering outsourcing contracts to cronys like Lockheed Martin, Halliburton's Brown & Root and DynCorps, don't they?

What's This? A Victory for Labor In Congress?

Republicans Pull Overtime Bill

"House Republican leaders yanked an overtime pay bill from Thursday's schedule after failing to find enough votes for passage, a rare win for labor unions in a Congress controlled by the GOP."

What's all the fuss about? The GOP's out to swipe your overtime. Read more here.

McWane Fingered in Workplace Accident

The NY Times is still all over McWane like fleas on a dog. That's not a bad thing, but hey guys, there are lots of other good health and safety stories out there.

FINE FOR MANUFACTURER OVER SAFETY

McWane Inc., a cast iron pipe manufacturer with one of the nation's most extensive records of workplace safety violations, was fined $130,000 by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The fines were the result of a recent OSHA investigation at the Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Company, a McWane plant in Phillipsburg, N.J. The agency found 12 new safety violations at the plant, 9 for serious or repeat infractions. The agency's inspection was prompted by an incident in December in which one worker lost three fingers cleaning a cement mixer.

OSHA Press Release here and a much longer article here. Atlantic States Press Release here.

Labels: McWane

OSHA TB Standard: R.I.P. -- Public Health System Approaching Breakdown?

As I noted last week, OSHA has finally decided to withdraw the tuberculosis standard, dumping over ten years of work into the trash can largely due to pressure from the health care industry. Ditching the TB standard could probably have not come at a worse time with a public health system approaching the breaking point between new demands placed upon it by preparations for SARS, new homeland security requirements, gigantic state budget problems and the Bush tax cuts eating up any chance of significant federal assistance.The TB standard could have been an important measure to help prepare this country not just to prevent a possible future increase in TB infections, but to also confront assaults from other air-borne diseases like SARS.

AFSCME, SEIU and a number of other unions petitioned OSHA for a Tuberculosis standard in 1993 in response to a nationwide outbreak of tuberculosis -- including multiple drug resistant TB -- that was exposing and killing health care and corrections workers. The standard was on the verge of being issued at the end of the Clinton administration, but because of OSHA's total focus on ergonomics, the curtain fell before the standard was finalized.

To what do we owe the demise of an almost completed health standard designed to protect health care, corrections and others from the second-leading infectious cause of death worldwide? An estimated 2 billion people -- one-third of the world's population -- are infected with the bacteria that cause TB, and about 2 million people die each year from the disease, according to the CDC. In the United States, minorities are affected disproportionately by TB: 54 percent of active TB cases in 1999 were among African-American and Hispanic people, with an additional 20 percent found in Asians.

One factor is Republicans like Mississippi Congressman Roger Wicker, a member of the Appropriations subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education, who has been a staunch foe of the TB standard and a major recipient of campaign contributions from the health care industry. Wicker had been putting pressure on OSHA for years to withdraw the standard.

Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA, John Henshaw justified his action by arguing that TB rates have fallen 43 percent since 1993, the (unenforceable) Centers for Disease Control guidelines "are working as far as reducing tuberculosis to the highest risk group -- health care workers," and OSHA has other priorities.

OK, let's look at this.

First, yes, the number of TB cases in this country has dropped sharply since the mid-1990's. But as AFSCME President Gerald W. McEntee said in a recent letter to Henshaw petitioning OSHA for issuance of the standard,

Although total cases in the United States have declined each year since 1992, the number of new cases only decreased by about two percent from 2000 to 2001....The number of cases actually increased in 20 states during this same period.....Fourteen states and the District of Columbia had tuberculosis rates that were higher than the 2001 national rate of 5.6 cases per 100,000 population."

Lee Erdmann, the city manager of Hartford, CT, certainly doesn't think the TB problem is going away. In a column opposing a bill that would create a new presumption that emergency medical personnel and public safety workers who are stricken by hepatitis, meningitis, or tuberculosis contracted the disease through their work and entitle them to automatic workers' compensation benefits, Erdman argued that the bill would:

impose a new and costly unfunded state mandate. The Office of Fiscal Analysis says there are "potential significant" fiscal implications for municipalities and has identified the bill as a costly "State Mandate." Noting that the number of cases of tuberculosis and meningitis are increasing, the Office of Fiscal Analysis says one case could cost $750,000 to $1.5 million.

Another recent article noted that "Tuberculosis cases in the United States fell to an all-time low last year, but they went up in Virginia. The Virginia Department of Health said Monday that the state had 315 cases last year, nine more than in 2001 for a 2.9 percent increase." And there have been recent outbreaks in Colorado, Maryland and elsewhere.

So is an OSHA standard really needed? This is the question that Congressional opponents of the standard, led by Wicker, asked the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to study. (Republicans used a similar tactic with ergonomics, asking the National Academy of Sciences to conduct two almost identical reviews of the scientific evidence undergirding OSHA's ergonomics standard.)

The IOM issued its report in 2001, finding that "Overall, the committee concludes that tuberculosis remains a threat to some health care, correctional facility, and other workers in the United States. Although the risk has been decreasing in recent years, vigilance is still needed within hospitals, prison, and similar workplaces, as well as in the community at large."

The IOM study also concluded that an OSHA standard was necessary to protect workers because an OSHA standard would help to sustain or increase adherence to effective workplace tuberculosis control measures. The IOM also found that an OSHA standard (unlike CDC recommendations) would increase compliance with tuberculosis control measures because workers will be in a stronger position to know what protections should be in place and to challenge employers who did not implement adequate prevention programs.

Sounds like the IOM gave Congress and OSHA a pretty clear message. So how do we explain this explanation for OSHA's action in the regulatory agenda? The IOM report

concluded that OSHA should move forward with a standard modeled after the CDC guidelines and tailored to the extent of TB risk present in the community. The IOM study concluded that an OSHA standard was needed to maintain national TB rates among health care and other employees at their current levels and to prevent future outbreaks of multidrug resistant and other forms of TB among these workers. OSHA reopened the record to obtain comment on the IOM study, the draft final risk assessment and the peer reviewers¡¯ comment on the risk assessment. The Agency has decided to withdraw the proposal.(emphasis added)

Well, that's perfectly clear.

Ditching the TB standard probably could not have come at a worse time. The United States faced a near epidemic of multiple drug resistant TB in the mid-1980's and early 1990s because the public health system in this country let down its guard. According to the IOM:

Complacency led to neglect of basic public health measures including surveillance, contact tracing, outbreak investigations, and case management services to ensure that individuals completed treatments for latent infection and active disease. This neglect helped set the stage for the resurgence of tuberculosis when new circumstances emerged—including the HIV/AIDS epidemic, the increase in multidrug-resistant disease (largely due to incomplete treatment), and expanded immigration from regions of the world with high rates of tuberculosis.

In hospitals across the country complacency translated into inadequate isolation rooms, ventilation systems that were not maintained, isolation room doors left open, infectious patients left to wander the halls and no training to recognize symptoms in waiting rooms. In correctional institutions the level of knowledge and control measures was virtually non-existent.

Now we may be faced with a new complacency fueled by an "all-clear" message from OSHA, falling national TB rates, and a public health system stressed to the breaking point by new homeland security demands, huge state budget problems and the Bush tax cuts eating up any chance of significant federal assistance.

Serious problems are already evident in the U.S. public health system

Keeping SARS from spreading in the United States is straining the already besieged public health system, and it's partly a matter of luck that this newest killer so far has been contained here.

The question is how long that luck will hold - and at what price. Health departments that already were struggling to deal with bioterrorism and West Nile virus say their ability to protect against more common threats today is compromised.

What if the anticipated summer resurgence of West Nile virus occurs at the same time as some other outbreak, perhaps food poisoning, and SARS is still around? Could CDC possibly handle it all, wonders Barry Bloom, dean of Harvard's School of Public Health.

APHA Executive Director Georges Benjamin testifying before Congress warned that

We are at a critical juncture in public health. For many years, experts have been warning us that our nation's public health infrastructure is in disarray. We lack adequate personnel and training, laboratory capacity and communications networks. There are serious gaps in our disease surveillance systems.

In fiscal year 2002, Congress appropriated $7.7 billion for CDC. In 2003, Congress appropriated $7.1 billion for CDC. The President's proposed budget for the agency in 2004 is $6.6 billion-an 8.5 percent cut over last year. We are moving in the wrong direction

This year, the budget for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health is slated for a 10 percent cut. CDC's NIOSH is the only federal agency responsible for conducting research and making recommendations for the prevention of work-related injuries.

Problems are already being felt on the local level.

Dr. Alonzo Plough, public health director for Seattle-King County, Washington says it's like an undermanned fire department having to choose which burning building to save: Between SARS, smallpox vaccination, West Nile preparation and a major tuberculosis outbreak, he's almost $2 million over budget already. His swamped infection specialists have a backlog of hepatitis cases to investigate, and they can forget any work soon to fight some rapidly increasing sexually transmitted diseases.

One of the main problems facing public health officials is the lack of infrastructure needed to protect workers and other patients from airborne diseases like TB and SARS.

Funding problems have prevented Seattle hospitals from providing enough rooms to contain infectious patients, said Plough.

"We're talking about major shortfalls in negative pressure (isolation room) capacity and hospitals' epidemiological capacity," Plough said. Keeping SARS from spreading in the United States is straining the already besieged public health system, and it's partly a matter of luck that this newest killer so far has been contained here.

OSHA seems intentionally oblivious to the connection between precautions for TB and similar precautions for SARS. As I wrote last month after AFSCME petitioned OSHA for issuance of the TB standard,

What's most interesting about this saga is that OSHA just posted a SARS Web Page. And although there are tons of references to OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard and references on its SARS webpage, there's not a single reference to tuberculosis, despite the fact that OSHA has an extensive TB webpage describing the same precautions that are needed to protect health care workers and others against SARS. Is the agency embarrassed that it [was about to repeal] the standard when it's clear now that it was needed?

Should SARS come calling in the U.S. as it has in parts of Canada, health care workers will be the first victims. SARS will be just another hazard added to the plague health care workers in the U.S. and Canada face daily. In Toronto,

SARS opened many people's eyes to the health risks nurses face on the job, but it is not surprising that most nurses shrugged it off as just another in a long time of hazards. More than 40 per cent of ward nurses suffer chronic back problems due to a combination of 12-hour shifts on their feet and lots of heavy lifting (100-pound nurses routinely have to move and restrain 200-pound patients). Emergency room nurses are victims of assault (drunks are the biggest problem, but increasingly, patients and family members frustrated by long waiting times also lash out).

Public health nurses are routinely exposed to tuberculosis, and jabs with needles; oncology and surgical nurses are exposed to noxious chemicals that leave them with higher cancer rates. Even shift work is a health hazard: It has been associated with higher rates of breast cancer and sleep disorders.

As AFL-CIO John Sweeney said in a statement following OSHA's announcement,

While Big Business in health care has pushed to block these safeguards, the Administration should value people over profit and provide workers the regulations they desperately need to protect themselves and patients from a serious health hazard.

Stay tuned for coming attractions: A standard that would have required employers to pay for workers' personal protective equipment was also on the verge of being issued at the end of the Clinton Administration. OSHA was rumored to be on the verge of withdrawing that standard as well until the United Food and Commercial Workers and National Hispanic Caucus petitioned the agency to release the standard. Might be a good time to call your Senators and representative.

Working Nights Linked To Risk of Colon Cancer

According to a new study:

Harvard Nurses who work regular night shifts have a higher risk of colon cancer, U.S. researchers reported. The study by researchers at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, supports earlier research that found women who work night shifts have a higher risk of breast cancer.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that about 4 percent of adults work rotating night shifts. Shift work disrupts melatonin production and increases levels of other hormones such as estrogen.

Women's cancers are often linked with estrogen, but Eva Schernhammer, who led the study, said melatonin may play a more important role.

The summary is here (Scroll Down) and a longer article here.

Republican Hypocrisy? Perish the Thought

Republicans believe in states rights -- unless they're pro-labor.

Paul Krugman Says WMD-Gate is Worse Than Watergate

Paul Krugman is pissed off too. So am I. And rightfully so....

The public was told that Saddam posed an imminent threat. If that claim was fraudulent, the selling of the war is arguably the worst scandal in American political history — worse than Watergate, worse than Iran-contra. Indeed, the idea that we were deceived into war makes many commentators so uncomfortable that they refuse to admit the possibility.

But here's the thought that should make those commentators really uncomfortable. Suppose that this administration did con us into war. And suppose that it is not held accountable for its deceptions....In that case, our political system has become utterly, and perhaps irrevocably, corrupted.

Molly Ivins & Al Franken on Ergonomics, Shrub and Liars

Here is a link to a panel discussion from Book Expo America 2003 with columnist Molly Ivins, Fox "News"man Bill O'Reilly and comedian Al Franken. The whole thing (at least Ivins and Franken) are worth listening to. But I want to highlight the section starting at minute 7:50 when Molly Ivins discusses talking to catfish processing workers who clean 12 catfish a minute about the repeal of the ergonomics standard.

You also get to hear Al Franken call Bill O'Reilly a liar. And that Republicans and Conservatives have made a habit of lying and we've been taking it too long. And then Franken and O'Reilly almost get into a fist fight. The whole thing is about an hour and a half, but it's worth every minute. Thanks to Buzzflash for bringing this to my attention. Speaking of which, you should subscribe to Buzzflash. They'll send you a few of the best news articles every day. Check it out.

Labels: Ergonomics

The Price of Fish

Article about a photo exhibit, "The Price of Fish," by labor photographer Earl Dotter "meant to enlighten people about the dangers of fishing and what crews are doing to improve conditions."

Dotter has been documenting hazardous working conditions for more than 30 years. In the 1970s, he lived among coal miners. Later, he expanded his work to steel mills, textile mills, construction, logging, health-care facilities, farming, maximum-security prisons and, most recently, emergency responders working on the pile at Ground Zero in New York City after 9/11.

If you happen to be in Portland, Maine, check it out. You can also see exerpts from this exhibit and many of Earl's other photos on his website.

The Republican Matrix

Check out Tom Tomorrow's "The Republican Matrix." Tom also references an article claiming that the Pentagon's Paul Wolfowitz thinks that Sadaam Hussein was behind the Oklahoma City bombing too.

Sure, I believe that. I hear he was also behind Pearl Harbor, the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, Bhopal, and remember the Maine?

Right to Know About Anthrax

In response to a Government Accounting Office report that concluded that the Postal Service did not notify Wallingford postal workers of anthrax contamination, the Connecticut Senate voted last week "to require all employers to immediately notify workers in similar situations."

What they don't know CAN hurt them

Good article here about efforts to teach immigrants their legal rights in Maryland, and here about efforts by unions and religious organizations in Minneapolis to fight for immigrants' rights.

Anti-Ergonuts: Someone Please Drive a Stake Through Their Cold Hearts

About 50,000 people in the state of Washington suffer preventable musculoskeletal injuries at work every year, costing the state workers’ compensation fund $400 million annually. The cost of this No. 1 source of workplace injuries is a major factor in driving up employers’ L&I premiums, making it harder to create and maintain good jobs. Nationwide, while the total number of ergonomics-related injuries is falling, they make up one-third of all work-related injuries year after year.

But like the living dead, foes of Washington State's ergonomics standard never give up. They tried to stop the standard before it was issued, to no avail. They've tried to legislate it to death, but failed. And the Governor threatens to veto any bill that reaches his desk. They've taken it to the courts and lost badly. Just a few weeks ago, they took it to the Washington State Supreme Court. (No word yet).

Now the Building Industry Association of Washington (BIA), a well-financed business lobbyist group that represents commercial home builders, is leading a campaign to get enough signatures to put a referendum on the ballot that would repeal the ergonomics standard. And they're not letting anything like the truth stand in their way.

A Bellingham Herald editorial described the lies told by representatives of the company gathering signatures for the BIA:

Signature gatherers for Initiative 841 were telling people in Spokane recently that under the rules adopted by the state Department of Labor & Industries that carpet layers and drywallers wouldn't be able to work more than two hours per day. Laborers could only lift one load weighing more than 75 pounds. Workers can't have their arms above their heads or their elbows above their shoulders for more than two hours per day. Mariners catcher Dan Wilson might not even be able to catch an entire game.

There's only one problem. None of this is true.

The company gathering the signatures admitted that the statements were false, as did the the BIA which contracted with the company that is gathering the signatures. The Herald isn't buying it.

The statements originated somewhere long before the initiative drive began and the BIA has an obligation to track down where the misinformation came from and explain how it got spread through its ranks and ultimately ended up as "talking points" for signature gatherers.

The Herald magnanimously states that "We have no reason to believe the BIA was involved in intentional deception. But a more complete explanation would go a long way toward restoring credibility to the organization's campaign."

Personally, I wouldn't be quite so charitable after looking at the BIA's webpage. The lies they tell there are just as bad as the ones described in the Herald. First they make the same old tired claims that the standard will bankrupt the construction industry in Washington. Then, packing into one short sentence more lies and distortions than entire industry webpages, they write that the high cost of the regulation is why "the U.S. Senate in 2001, led by democrat Tom Daschle (SD) voted to repeal the ergonomics rule being considered by the federal government, which was far less restrictive and less expensive than Washington's." (emphasis added)

For those of you reading this who have already forgotten one of the first high crimes of the Bush administration and have not understanding of the American political process, allow me to dissect this paragraph:

1. The federal OSHA ergonomics standard was repealed in March 2001. The Senate at that time was still in Republican hands. Jim Jeffords (I-VT) had not yet defected, throwing the Senate into Democratic hands.

2. Although they are trying to imply that Tom Daschle led the Senate to repeal the ergonomics standard, at that time Daschle was Senate minority leader and a vigorous supporter of the ergonomics standard. Had the Democrats been in control of the Senate, it is very likely that millions of American workers would today have effective protections against ergonomic hazards.

3. The federal ergonomics standard was not being "considered," it had already been issued.

4. The federal standard was in many ways much broader than Washington's. It contained medical monitoring and work removal protection which provided wage replacement for workers who could not work due to work-related musculoskeletal injuries. The only reason the BIA thinks is was "less restrictive and less expensive," is that it didn't cover the construction industry. For BIA members, therefore, it was much less restrictive and expensive.

The BIA also claims that the standard will "encourage frivolous lawsuits against employers by employees," conveniently forgetting that employees are not allowed to sue their employers for work-related injuries. They're also SHOCKED that the standard was "adopted by unelected bureaucrats....with no input from elected officials." (I hope these guys are American citizens, because I doubt that they could pass the citizenship test.)

(Of course, it may not really be all that amusing. Lies can be effective, as anyone who has been politically conscious for the past couple of years knows.)

Interestingly, the entire construction industry is not backing Prop. 841. The Associated General Contractors of Washington are remaining neutral. In a letter titled "AGC protects workers and contractors through ergonomics training and research," Roland Dewhurst, CEO/Executive Vice President of the Washington State AGC states that

As an organization we are committed to continue implementing the [ergonomics] programs we have published and completing the research we have begun. In the long run, we believe that is a better solution than taking a "one way or the other" approach. We believe we can help reduce worker injuries and protect contractor rights at the same time.

The Washington State AFL-CIO is leading a vigorous "Think Before You Ink" campaign to keep the referendum off the ballot.

As I've pointed out before, although it has flaws, the Washington State ergonomics standard is the most effective of the two existing state ergonomics standards. (California is the other. Because of its serious weaknesses, the California AFL-CIO is engaged in a campaign to strengthen it.) The anti-ergonuts are making repeal of the Washington State standard a top priority, realizing that if they can kill it, those forces favoring a federal standard, as well as more state standards, will lose their only effective regulatory foothold.

Meanwhile, back at the fort...

The anti-ergonuts are also trying to kill American National Standard Institutes proposed consensus ergonomics standard which has been under development for over ten years. The ANSI Z365 Ergonomics Committee is administered by the National Safety Council (NSC) and includes representatives from business, labor, academia and professional societies. The NSC is finally getting close to finalizing the standard. But the anti-ergonuts have been pressuring the NSC to abort the standard under the threat of a lawsuit. So far the NSC is resisting.

Stuck even further in the dark ages than Bush's OSHA, the anti-ANSI forces persist in denying that there is any basis for a connection between work and musculoskeletal disorders like carpal tunnel syndrome. Ignoring the thousands of studies, including two National Academy of Sciences reviews, the flat-earth type society persists in citing a "lack of scientific and medical consensus on the proper diagnosis and treatment of work-related musculoskeletal injuries." Although industry opposition is by no means universal, the foes of the ANSI standard argue that because some are opposed, there can, by definition, never be any "consensus."

The other tactic the anti-ergonuts are using is to charge the NSC with process violations. Larry Halpern, attorney for the National Coalition on Ergonomics charges that the process lacks openness, balance, due process as well as consensus. Procedural violations are one of the tactics that the anti-ergonuts used to fight OSHA's ergonomics standard. (They charged that OSHA had improperly compensated consultants to defend OSHA's proposed standard, even though all regulatory agencies -- under Republican and Democratic administrations do the same thing.)

I've served on the ANSI Z365 committee and it's open (anyone, including observers, can contribute), balanced (labor, academics and industry) and has due process out the wazoo. As far as consensus, many of the industry participants agree with the process and with the need for a standard. Halpern and a few of his cronies don't want a mandatory or a voluntary standard and they're trying to use the same tired old objections to try to block consensus.

The problem is that these guys don't want anything -- no OSHA standard, no voluntary consensus standards. They don't even like the Bush administration's voluntary ergonomcs guidelines because they accept that there is a connection between workplace conditions and msuculoskeletal injuries.

According to Inside OSHA, "Halpern said the only way to resture due process to the effort of crafting a consensus ergonomics standard is 'would be for the standard to be withdrawn and the committee to be dissolved.'" Yeah, that's the ticket. The committee should see the error of its ways and commit suicide. Then we could reappoint another committee made up solely of representatives from the Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, National Federation of Independent Businesses, the Food Marketing Institute, maybe the Mercatus Institute and the Republican National Committee for good measure. At least then we'd have consenus.

The bottom line is that this is not about ergonomics, it's not about the process and it's not about the science. It's about right-wing ideology. It's about industry associations like the Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers raising money and building political power on the backs of workers.

And it's about time we stop them. These regulatory "debates" and political battles rarely make the front pages, and almost never make the evening news. While the news covers the war in Iraq and tax cuts for the wealthy, battles are being fought behind the scenes that directly affect whether workers will come home injured or healthy, alive or dead from a day at work. There are good guys and bad guys. This is information that everyone needs to know -- especially as we enter an election year.

Labels: Ergonomics

More Truth About Workers Comp

Nightmare on K St.

Death by Fraud?

Happy Days Are Gone Again

Hard Week

Working Families Locked Out of Labor Department

Workers Compensation Letters to the Editor

The Weekly Toll

Who's to Blame?

Workers are From Mars, Environmentalists are From Venus?

Solution: Just Transition

Keep The Stolen Loot, Just Try Not To Let It Happen Again

BACK TO THE YELLOWSTONE AGE

Chemical Industry Steps Up To the Plate...And Strikes Out

CSB Releases Nitrogen Hazard Bulletin

Daubert, Junk Science and Polluters

One Big Sector

Meanwhile, In a Parallel Universe, Somewhere in the Midwest....

Another Victory Over Terrorism

Home of the Fearful, Land of the Imprisoned

Workers Comp Fraud

Asbestos Compensation Update

Workers Compensation Crisis

Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid

Question of the Week

The Weekly Toll

Dust to Ashes

The Best Laid Plans....

PESTICIDE OR SPERMICIDE?

Job Opening: New EPA Administrator; Ostrich Wanted

OSHA Takes Front Stage in Congress

Comic Relief:

Deadly Jewelry

More Ergo Follies

A Little Bit of Home in Baghdad

He Lies, He Scores!

Democracy in America

Happy Fathers Day: The Weekly Toll

Gettelfinger: Free Trade = Death

You get down in that hole there boy and I don't want to see any attitude...

Death by Work

US Nurses Take Note: Coming to a Hospital Near You?

More SARS Nurses

More on Corzine Bill

Bill Moyers: Our American History

SARS: View from a Hospital in Toronto

Nurses: Understaffing, Back Injuries, Violence and Now SARS

"Unpreventable Employee Misconduct'' Caused Death of Two Workers

Unions Petition OSHA to Revise Process Safety Standard

CORZINE CALLS FOR SEVERE PUNISHMENT OF EMPLOYERS WHO VIOLATE SAFETY LAWS

Let Them Eat Yellowcake

OSHA Announces New Grant Program: Get it While it Lasts.

Blue - Green Alliance Lives

Rumsfeld: Unions, We don't need no stinkin' unions! Part II

How Much is that Advert in the Paper?

Rumsfeld: We Don't Need No Stinkin' Civil Service Rules

What's This? A Victory for Labor In Congress?

McWane Fingered in Workplace Accident

OSHA TB Standard: R.I.P. -- Public Health System Approaching Breakdown?

Working Nights Linked To Risk of Colon Cancer

Republican Hypocrisy? Perish the Thought

Paul Krugman Says WMD-Gate is Worse Than Watergate

Molly Ivins & Al Franken on Ergonomics, Shrub and Liars

The Price of Fish

The Republican Matrix

Right to Know About Anthrax

What they don't know CAN hurt them

Anti-Ergonuts: Someone Please Drive a Stake Through Their Cold Hearts