I have three pictures side by side in my house: John L. Lewis, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Jesus. I draw Social Security on account of FDR. I draw a pension on account of John L. Lewis, and I'm going to Heaven because of Jesus.
-- Jack McReynolds, 70, retired miner, West Frankfort, KY
A construction crew installing storm drains in Washington County was not using suggested safety precautions when a trench wall collapsed Tuesday, killing one worker and injuring another, rescue workers and township officials said.
William Partin, 39, of Hoffman Drive, North Fayette, was pronounced dead at the scene, according to North Franklin police.
These tragedies always make me mad. This one makes even more angry. Why?
[Washington City Fire Department duty captain Douglas] Trbovich said that he saw a trench box about 100 yards away from the accident site.
Township Supervisor Carole Beck and township administrator Scott Novak, who both visited the scene, agreed that the trench box was not being used.
Novak said since the project began about five weeks ago, the township's quality-control inspector has made repeated suggestions to workers and company officials to use the trench box.
"You really have to ask them why they haven't been using it. They've been advised to, but for whatever reason they decided not to," Novak said.
Novak added that the township inspector is not a safety officer and has no authority to order the company to take any safety measures.
So the township's quality control inspector knew for five weeks that the trench box wasn't being used presenting a potentially deadly situation, but didn't do anything because he isn't a safety officer?! How about calling OSHA? (The toll-free number, by the way, is (800) 321-OSHA and local numbers can be found here.)
And I have a very hard time understanding why, if this was a city contract, there was no one in the city government who had the authority (or who took the initiative) to shut down a project that was clearly putting workers at imminent risk of death.
In fact, it might be useful for OSHA to educate city and county officials about recognizing such hazards and making sure someone close to the job is authorized to shut it down, or at to least refer the problem to OSHA.
The collision of two freight trains released a plume of toxic fumes that killed an engineer and two people who lived nearby, investigators said Tuesday. Two others were left critically ill.
A tanker car carrying pressurized chlorine broke open in the collision, venting tons of gas into the air. A small amount of ammonium nitrate was also released from three UP cars.
The gas clouds dissipated by late Monday morning, after drifting up to 10 miles to San Antonio's SeaWorld amusement park, where six people were treated for minor respiratory irritation.
Jerry Leyva, an investigator with the Bexar County Medical Examiner's office, said Gene Hale, 85, and Lois Koerber, 59, died from the effects of breathing chlorine gas. Their bodies were found Monday afternoon in their home about a mile from the crash.
Also killed by the gas was Heath Pape, a 23-year-old conductor aboard the Union Pacific train.
Leyva said the deaths have been ruled accidental.
Two people who lived near the crash remained in critical condition. San Antonio Fire Department spokesman Randy Jenkins said more than 40 other people suffered mostly minor respiratory irritation.
This happened in a rural area killing two people about a mile from the crash. Imagine if it had happened in the center of a major city, say Washington D.C.?
Three trials brought about by lawsuits filed by workers whose lungs were (allegedly) destroyed by exposure to diacetyl, a butter-flavoring for microwave popcorn. The first ended up in a $20 million verdict for the worker and his wife, while the second was settled minutes before the jury returned its verdict.
Now, the jury in the third trial has decided that the companies that manufactured the chemical, International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. and Bush Boake Allen Inc., were not to blame for the lung damage suffered by, former workers Dustin Smith, 25, Evelyn Standhardt, 60, and Marge Unruh 51, and current worker Velma Ingalls, 34.
The four sued the two companies, claiming that a butter flavoring used at the Jasper Popcorn Co. plant in Jasper contained a chemical known as diacetyl that health experts say caused the four to contract bronchiolitis obliterans, a rare lung disease that causes shortness of breath and progressively restricts the airways.
International Flavors purchased Bush Boake Allen in 2001. The butter flavoring that the workers contend caused their illness was made by Bush Boake Allen.
In closing arguments, Mike Patton, an attorney representing International Flavors, and Frank Woodside, an attorney representing Bush Boake Allen, told the jury that improper industrial hygiene at the Jasper popcorn plant was to blame for the workers' illnesses.
Neither the original owners of the popcorn plant nor Gilster-Mary Lee Corp., which purchased the plant in 1999, was named in the lawsuits.
Patton said that since workers have started wearing respirators and the plant has enclosed the mixing area, no one has gotten sick at the plant, which continues to use the same butter flavoring.
"Proper industrial hygiene solved the problem," Patton said.
Woodside told the jury that the Kansas City occupational physician who diagnosed the outbreak of bronchiolitis obliterans in 2000 described the condition as "a unique and previously unrecognized disease." Woodside said that before 2001, no one knew that diacetyl could damage the lungs.
"We're supposed to warn or know about a new disease that didn't exist before?" Woodside asked the jury.
Indeed, how would you? Unless...it's not entirely true. It was in 1993 that BASF found that “After breathing diacetyl vapors for just four hours, some rats gagged and gasped for breath. Half the rats in the study died within a day."
Meanwhile, in the early 1990's, International Flavors & Fragrances, one of the targets of the lawsuits, was distributing Material Safety Data Sheets that contained the phrases "no known health hazards" and "respiratory protection is not normally required," while at the same time eqipping their workers with respirators.
So, as I asked at the beginning, is this where the United States of America needs to be at the beginning of the 21st century -- waiting until guinea pigs workers are made ill or killed by unregulated (and often untested) toxic chemicals, then depending on the arbitrary whims of juries as our only means to compensate them (or their survivors)? And hopefully in the process warning chemical manufacturers to be a bit more careful in the future lest their shareholders get mad if they lose a lawsuit.
Bush Administration Reaches Out to Strangle European Chemical Initiative
The Bush administration has filed a formal comment with the World Trade Organization that (surprise, surprise) is critical of Europe's proposed system to regulate industrial chemicals, commonly known as REACH. Meanwhile, Senators Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Jim Jeffords (I-VT) sent a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick expressing their "concern that the Bush administration is catering to the U.S. chemical industry in its opposition to a proposed European environmental law."
Lautenberg and Jeffords called on Mr. Zoellick to explain in detail how the administration developed its position, what analysis it performed, and whether it allowed public health officials, labor, environmental or consumer groups to have a voice in developing the U.S. position.
The Senators wrote, "We are troubled by reports that the position of this administration on REACH may reflect the interests of a narrow segment of U.S. industry without consideration of the broader ramifications for the U.S. economy, national interest, public health, and the environment." They also requested the administration to specify, "which provisions of REACH you consider may be in conflict with provisions of the relevant WTO agreements."
The administration's complaint foretold the end of Western Civilization should the policy be implemented. In short, the complaint predicted "substantial potential adverse effects on European economic growth and employment," and that it could "adversely impact production and transatlantic trade worth tens of billions of dollars in chemicals and downstream products," "impact the majority of U.S. goods exported to the EU," cause "manufacturers of chemicals for many applications to halt production," force "some EU and foreign manufacturers of chemicals and downstream products [to] simply exit the EU market," [impose] "disruptions on importers of chemicals..., impact negatively innovation and hinder the introduction into the EU market of more effective and safer chemicals and downstream products," cause "uncertainty in the market," and "anti-competitive results."
Furthermore, according to the U.S. document, there are problems with workability, viability of small manufacturers, complex administrative coordination, needless duplication and a lack of consistency in implementation and enforcement.
the draft regulation still appears to adopt a particularly costly, burdensome, and complex approach, which could prove unworkable in its implementation, disrupt global trade, and adversely impact innovation.
But never fear, the document assures the Europeans that
The United States shares the EU’s interest in ensuring robust protection of the environment and human health. Our societies demand that we achieve these objectives. These are objectives we achieve through our domestic regulation and through our active participation in activities to promote international regulatory cooperation and harmonization in the area of chemicals.
Of course, "our domestic regulation" that allegedly achieves "robust protection of the environment and human health" has a few problems as I've outlined before:
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), passed in 1976, does a fairly good job requiring chemical manufacturers to test and prove the safety of new chemicals.
The main problem with TSCA is that when it was passed, it “grandfathered” in chemicals in commerce prior to December 1979, which still make up 99% by volume of all chemicals used in the United States today. These chemicals are considered safe unless the Environmental Protection Agency can demonstrate that they present an “unreasonable risk” to human health and the environment on a chemical by chemical basis.
The ineffectiveness of TSCA was made clear in a 1994 Report by the U.S. Government Accounting Office that found that since TSCA was passed, EPA has only been able to restrict only five chemicals (PCBs, chlorofluorocarbons, dioxin, asbestos and hexavalent chromium.)
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found that less than ten percent of the approximately 2,800 high production volume chemicals (those produced over one million pounds per year) have a basic set of publicly available toxicity information;more than forty percent lack any toxicity information at all. Even less is known about chemicals produced in smaller volumes or mixtures of chemicals. Yet, this lack of evidence of toxicity is often misinterpreted as evidence of safety.
In May, Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) released a report detailing how the State Department and other US government agencies "planned a wide range of actions to build opposition to REACH." Among those actions were cables sent by US Secretary of State Colin Powell, drawing heavily on themes developed by industry representatives instructing US embassies to argue that REACH "appears to be a costly, burdensome, and complex regulatory system, which could prove unworkable in its implementation."
Waxman called on President Bush to make public details of the U.S. activities with regard to REACH and a clear statement that the U.S. will not work to undermine environmental protections in other countries. "Every sovereign nation should be permitted to enact legitimate public health and environmental protections as they see fit."
President Bush clearly feels that the right of a sovereign nation to enact public health and environmental regulations ends at the point where it affects the profits and prerogatives of the U.S. chemical industry. For that reason, it is vitally important that we support the European REACH initiative as it becomes increasingly (and depressingly) clear that until there is a major change in the political/power relationships in this country, we may never be able to achieve adequate protections against chemicals hazards threatening American workers, consumers and communities (despite recurring "popcorn lung" and other, less evident tragedies.) The European initiative may be the only tool with enough leverage to force changes in an American chemical industry that wants to keep doing business in Europe. It's good to see Congressman Waxman and Senators Lautenberg and Jeffords standing up to the administration. Let's see if we can't elect enough additional like-minded representatives (and a President, while we're at it) who will support the Europeans instead of undermining them.
Bert Seidman died earlier this week at the age of 84. Some of you old time union health and safety staffers will remember Bert's benevalent directorship of the AFL-CIO's health and safety program in the 1980's after the retirement of George Taylor who founded the AFL-CIO's health and safety department. When Taylor retired, the powers-that-be couldn't face turning the department over to the his obvious successor, a very young woman named Peg Seminario, who only a few years before had started at the AFL-CIO as an intern.
So, the Occupational Safety and Health Department was folded into the Department of Health, Safety and Social Security which addressed the federation's health care, pensions, social welfare and occupational health issues. When Bert retired in 1990, the Occupational Safety and Health Department again emerged, with Peg as the Director. The rest is history.
I didn't know Bert well, and he was already pretty old when I met him. So I was interested to read a bit of his early life in the Washington Post obituary:
Mr. Seidman was born in Brooklyn, N.Y., and enrolled in City College of New York, where he joined the Socialist Party. He transferred to the University of Wisconsin at Madison, from which he earned an undergraduate degree in economics in 1938.
After college he worked for the Works Progress Administration in New York on unemployment issues, then returned to Madison to obtain a master's degree in economics in 1941. While there, he was active in the Young People's Socialist League and the co-op movement and became associated with the two Socialist mayors of Milwaukee. He became a pacifist and an anti-communist. After leaving Madison, he worked for the Bureau of Labor Statistics in Washington.
Beginning in 1944, he performed alternative service as a conscientious objector. While clearing the path for the Blue Ridge Parkway, he held classes in industrial relations for his fellow workers. When the war ended and the government stopped paying conscientious objectors but would not release them from service, Mr. Seidman led a year-long strike against the federal government, working from Pasadena, Calif.
After the strike was settled, he moved back to New York, where he became the assistant executive secretary of the Workers' Defense League.
He joined the staff of the American Federation of Labor in Washington in 1948 and worked for the AFL, and then for the AFL-CIO, for more than four decades.
And even long after he retired, almost until the day he died, it was the rare demonstration that you didn't see Bert in the appropriate T-shirt carrying a sign and demanding justice.
The 15,000 private contractors in Iraq make up the second largest army in the country. Being in Iraq, they tend to have a fairly high chance of getting injured -- or worse. And being workers, they get workers compensation, just like anyother worker. Workers Comp Insider has the whole story.
"Labor Department officials said they had no cost estimate for reimbursements of Iraq-related claims, but given the maximum payment of $1,030.78 per week and the number of injuries and deaths, it could well climb into the multimillions. In past years, annual reimbursement costs under the War Hazards Act have ranged from $1 million to $2 million.
...Rates have ranged from an early low of $10 per $100 of an employer's payroll to as much as much as $40 per $100 of payroll in recent months, said Hartwig of the insurance institute. That means an employer with a million-dollar payroll would pay between $100,000 and $400,000 in premiums.
In 1999, OSHA implemented its "Site Specific Targeting Program" that targeted inspections at workplaces with high injury and illness rates.Inside OSHA (subscription only) reports that industry is planning to propose alternative methods for OSHA's targeting system.
The current system, based on recordable injuries illnesses, picks up too many ergonomics injuries.
"The formula tends to show sprains and strains rather than severe injuries in workplaces," an industry source says. "Those injuries usually fall under the musculoskeletal disorder category and there is not complete science to back those injuries up."
The source cited nursing homes as an example of an industry that is highly targeted for inspections but does not actually generate a high number of severe injuries.
Of course, that all depends on what your definition of "severe" is. I've met more than a few nurses who can no longer work, who can no longer lift their children and can no longer live a pain-free life who would characterize their injuries as "severe."
That there are few severe injuries in nursing homes would also come as news to OSHA director John Henshaw who has stated that Nursing home workers have 2 1/2 times as many injuries and illnesses as private sector workers. And over half of those injuries are from overexertion and other ergonomic problems.
And as we all know, ergonomics citations under George Bush's OSHA are bringing the nursing home industry to its knees. In fact, according to OSHA's webpage, there have been a grand total of eight (8) federal OSHA citations against nursing homes during the entire 3 1/2 years of the Bush administration. And the grand total of all of the penalties? $10,550.
("Uh, Could you repeat that?" "Well, sure, I'd be glad to.")
Yes, $10,550 for all 8. That's an average of $1,319 per citation. In other words the grand total of all of the penalties for every ergonomics violation cited by federal OSHA during the entire Bush administration comes to far less than the cost of one (1) single surgery caused by a back injury.
OSHA is already shortchanging nursing homes. Nursing homes with high injury and illness numbers dominated OSHA's targeting list to such an extent that the agency recently announced that it would only inspect half of them.
Clearly there's a problem here, but it's not that the nursing home industry "does not actually generate a high number of severe injuries," but rather that the industry does not actually generate a high number of serious citations.
In other words, we seeing the failure of OSHA's COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO ERGONOMICS. It is, in fact nothing but crap: A total of 14 total citations by federal OSHA and two guidance documents in 3 1/2 years. The highest of the 14 was $6300 to Supervalue, while the average penalty was just over $2,500, hardly a figure that can be expected to strike fear into the hearts of employers whose workers are suffering one-third of all workplace injuries and illnesses every year.
The industry's solution seems to think that back injuries are all make-believe (or perhaps just a result of tennis and golf games that nurses are so fond of after work every day.) Stop paying so much attention to them and they'll go away.
This 23 year old kid was working in a 25 foot deep trench. His name was Ronal Jordan Perez and he was from Guatemala. (He was misidentified in an earlier article.)
The company, Delmarva Site Development Inc, had been inspected by Maryland OSHA in 2001 and cited as part of a special emphasis program focusing on trench safety.
The inspectors found "serious" violations of two federal standards. The first requires employers to instruct their workers on how to avoid unsafe conditions, records show. The second obliges employers to provide an adequate system to protect employees in an excavation from cave-ins.
State authorities also found less serious violations of four other standards, including rules mandating that employers train workers for the dangers of hazardous chemicals on their work site and that workers wear hard hats.
Delmarva Site Development initially was fined $1,800. However, federal records indicate that the penalty was reduced to $600 within weeks because the company had corrected the violations.
In other words, they knew what the law required. If they are cited with a willfull violation (which from what I know at this point, they should), the state should go after a criminal conviction -- and jail.
Jordan Barab, a former official with the federal Occupational Health and Safety Administration, said that deep trenches are one of the most dangerous work environments -- with collapses causing the deaths of 53 workers nationwide in 2003. "Soil, especially wet soil, is extremely heavy," said Barab, who maintains a Web site on worker safety issues. "A cubic yard weighs as much as a small car."
Someday, maybe articles like this will appear the front page of the paper instead buried in the "B" section.
jordan barab worker safety jordan barab worker safety worker safety jordan barab worker safety jordan barab worker safety jordan barab worker safety
After the accident, the Department of Buildings issued building code violations to the project's developer, Yong Fa Cai, and his company, USA Heng Tai Inc., for failing to provide any "sheeting, shoring or bracing" to protect their workers.
The project has since been aborted, and the site is expected to be backfilled soon, said Ilyse Fink, a spokeswoman for the buildings department. Meanwhile, investigations opened by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Queens district attorney's office are continuing, and several elected officials have called for tougher penalties against contractors who flout safety rules.
Mr. Shen's death has also opened a window onto an often anonymous network in which workers from China depend on personal references and help-wanted ads to land risky work for which they may not even be trained.
Ergonomics Transformation in Notoriously Painful Industry
During the never-ending ergonomics debates, industry representatives delight in explaining how ergonomics success stories are just that -- just anecdotal stories signifying nothing.
The Sacramento Bee has yet another story (check here for previous story) about a group of garment factory workers and organizations in Oakland and Los Angeles that are proving the industry flaks wrong. Relatively simple and inexpensive interventions such as better factory chairs can not only relieve workers' knee, hand and foot pain, but "can achieve productivity gains by improving working conditions -sometimes as much as 20 percent"
The factories employ more than 140,000 people, most of them Chinese women in Northern California and Latina women in Southern California.
They complain of similar aches, pains and injuries: aching shoulders, backs and arms; pinched nerves; repetitive stress injuries to elbows, wrists and hands; and strained or even torn vertebral disks that may not heal, according to Ira Janowitz, an ergonomics expert with the University of California system.
Inside the crowded, narrow KC Sewing shop, about 30 women assemble designer evening gowns from piles of pink chiffon and black satin. Over the whir of sewing machines, Chinese opera music pours from mounted speakers.
Before workstations were transformed and metal chairs replaced, Lin said, her body ached almost constantly. After spending her days hunched over a sewing machine, sometimes she could barely lift her neck.
"It's like a pain inside the bone, every single bone," she said, speaking in Cantonese through a translator.
The University of California at San Francisco, the Asian Immigrant Women Advocates in Oakland, the California Department of Health Services and the University of California's Ergonomics Program formed a coalition to introduce modern ergonomic standards to garment shops. They began in the San Francisco bay area with federal, state and local funding, and inspired the US Centers for Disease Control to fund a similar program to replicate the study in an $850,000 project in 10 Los Angeles County garment shops.
Ergonomic experts descended on the three test shops - hammering extensions onto sewing tables, building footrests, padding the knee pedals used throughout the day, tilting the tables, pasting down a sticky surface to keep cloth from sliding, brightening the lighting, and making other small but significant changes.
The crowning enhancement was the padded, adjustable chair designed like one used by cello players, who also work in a forward-bending position.
The workers loved the upgrades, which cost about $250 per workstation. "They noticed the improvements within a week," said Kam Lin Chao, one of the owners of KC Sewing.
The ergonomics team estimated that nearly half the workers in the test shops reported that their neck, shoulder and back pains were gone, according to a 2002 study of the project. Almost all workers with knee, hand or foot pain reported it was gone or substantially reduced.
Just think. If we had an ergonomics standard, this story would be so normal that the press would be bored with it by now.
On Tuesday, Roberts said that top MSHA officials have been traveling across the country recently to promote the agency's successes. But coal mining deaths actually increased last year, from 27 in 2002 to 30 in 2003, Roberts said.
The 14 fatalities so far in 2004 compare to 13 at the same point in 2003, according to MSHA data.
"The UMWA continues to remind people that coal mining is not getting safer," Roberts said.
UMW Local 93 member Robert Rice II was killed June 10 at the former Marrowbone Development coal preparation complex in Mingo County when he lost control of a truck, jumped from the vehicle and was run over by it, according to a preliminary MSHA report. Rice and other workers at the idled facility were trying to fix drainage control problems at a coal slurry impoundment, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection.
Local 2397 member Kenneth Battles was killed June 16 at the Jim Walters No. 7 mine near Brookwood, AL, when a piece of equipment began to move without warning. UMW member Gary Wayne Keeton was killed in April in a similar accident at Jim Walters No. 7, in Alabama.
Edwin Pennington, 25,of Bledsoe, KY was crushed June 16 when some 200 feet of rocks collapsed on top of him in a Bell County Coal Corp. underground mine at Coal Creek just outside of Middlesboro. Pennington was working with a crew that was performing retreat mining, a process used in played-out mines in which portions of coal pillars that support the roof are removed.
Eric Chaney, 26, of Kimper, KY, was killed June 17 at the Dags Branch Coal Corp. No. 6 mine at Feds Creek. He was moving cables near a mining machine when rocks fell on him. Chaney was assisting the operator of a continuous miner, a machine that loosens coal in underground mines and feeds it onto conveyors.
In 1996, in an effort to make its inspection efforts more efficient, OSHA introduced its "phone-fax" process where employees could phone or fax in a complaint, instead of sending in a written, signed complaint form. Although employees still retained the option to request an on-site inspection, the phone-fax procedure enabled OSHA to phone or fax the employer about less serious hazards, alerting him or her of the complaint and then request documentary evidence that the complaint had been addressed. At the request of Congressman Charlie Norwood (R-GA), the Government Accounting Office has investigated whether this policy is allowing OSHA to conserve its resources, respond to complaints and identify serious hazards.
I haven't studied the complete report too carefully, but one GAO recommendation is quite troubling.
Interviews conducted by GAO found that some inspections resulting from the phone-fax process were "not necessarily warranted because they have inadequately or inaccurately characterized the nature of he hazard." One reason was that complainants often have a "limited knowledge of OSHA's health and safety standards or may not completely understand what constitutes a violation."
In addition, about half of the OSHA area office directors and compliance officers reported receiving complaints from employees (and sometimes ex-employees) "as retribution" against their employers because they had been fired or were angry with their supervisors. "Some" compliance officers reported "an increase in the number of complaints during contract negotiations," but over half of those interviewed said that "almost all of the complaints they see warrant an inspection or investigation." According to another official, "managers seldom find that a complaint was filed to willfully harass an employer."
Overall, GAO found that in both inspections at workplaces that were "targeted" by OSHA (based on a high injury/illness rate in a high risk industry), as well as complaint-driven inspections, serious violations were found in only half of the worksites they inspected.
In order to increase the percentage of inspection that find serious hazards, GAO made three recommendations:
reminding complainants of the penalties for providing false information,
conducting outreach to employees regarding hazards, and
encouraging employers to have safety committees that would initially address complaints.
The second and third recommendations clearly make sense, although OSHA is going in the exact opposite direction of the second recommendation by attempting to eliminate the Susan Harwood worker training program.
The first recommendation, however, is very troublesome. First, although there are some anecdotal stories of workers deliberately filing false or exaggerated complaints, there is no indication that this is a major problem and many OSHA officials don't see it as a problem at all.
The law states that "Violations can be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000. or by imprisonment of not more than six months, or by both." When I was at OSHA working on the worker web page, early versions included the notice reminding complainants of these penalties on almost every page, in addition to the existing warning on the downloadable written complaint form, as well as the on-line complaint form.
After asking around, we found, first, that no one remembered a single instance where this sanction had ever been used against a worker. But most important, there was a general consensus that repeating this warning too many times would intimidate workers from filing complaints for fear that even an honest mistake could mean a $10,000 fine or jail time.
And anyone who reads this web page (especially the Weekly Toll) or knows anything about workplace safety conditions in this country knows that the last thing the federal government needs to do is to discourage more workers from filing complaints.
And what was OSHA's response? To his credit, Assistant Secretary John Henshaw protested that the law guarantees workers the right to request an inspection if they believe that a serious hazard exists.
As such, any action taken by the Agencythat discourages the exercise of this right could deter employees fro requesting workplace inspections and thus would need to be considered in recognition of the fundamental right established by the act. The challenge is to pursue administrative efficiency while assuring that the rights of workers, as provided by the statute, are not eroded.
GAO responded that they still "believe that the agency could take such actions without discouraging employees from filing legitimate complaints." If their belief is based on anything aside from wishful thinking, they aren't letting on.
Regarding the outreach recommendation, Henshaw stated that the agency was already conducting a "wide variety of outreach programs and activities through its extensive compliance assistance program."
As far as health and safety committees go, "OSHA does believe that labor-management cooperation should be encouraged. However, OSHA does not and should not, specify the manner in which such cooperation takes place."
What we have here is a failure by GAO to understand what goes on in an American workplace and the courage it takes for workers -- especially unorganized or immigrant workers -- to file an OSHA complaint. Part of this ignorance could be due to the fact that GAO only interviewed six workers as part of this investigation, and no union representatives.
Dr. Nancy Welch, health director in Chesapeake, a community near Norfolk, ... said it is unknown how the nurse caught TB. Health care workers are known to be at high risk for the disease.
The nurse had been coughing since October, but continued to work at Chesapeake until April, officials said.
Testing will begin this week of hundreds of persons known to have been exposed to the nurse.
"In this day and age, it is shameful that people should be dying of an otherwise preventable and curable disease - such as tuberculosis," said Dr. Kenneth G. Castro, director of the tuberculosis elimination division for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.
Bob Herbert in the NY Times has run two articles on the medical malpractice "crisis" in the country where the insurance industry is attempting to pass tort reform on the state and federal level that would limit the amount the patients can win through lawsuits. But as Herbert summarizes:
What is needed is a nationwide crackdown on malpractice, not a campaign to roll back the rights of patients who are injured. This is another utterly typical example of the Bush administration going to bat for those who are economically and politically powerful against those who are economically and politically weak.
Despite claims by the insurance industry, there is no evidence that soaring malpractice premiums are the result of sharp increases in the amounts of money paid out for malpractice claims. And, tellingly, industry executives are generally careful not to say that the tort reforms sought by the Bush administration will result in premium reductions.
This is all about greed. What tort reform will lead to, not surprisingly, is an unwarranted burst of additional profits for the insurance industry, which is why the industry is sinking so much money into its unrelenting campaign for "reform."
Last week, Herbert ran an article about an Ohio obstetrician/gynecologist that President Bush had singled out as a victim of frivolous lawsuits that had run him out of business.
But as Herbert describes, "Since the early 1990's, he has settled lawsuits and agreed to the payment of damages in a number of malpractice cases in which patients suffered horrible injuries."
I have covered the malpractice controversy here most recently.
Malpractice insurance rates are way too high, although the number of doctors being driven out of business is debatable.
There is no explosion of "frivolous" lawsuits
Rates are rising because of bad investments by the insurance companies over the past several years. (They had invested heavily in a rising stock market while cutting rates to attract customers and cash flow. Then the stock market crashed and the needed to raise rates to help their bottom line.
The focus needs to be on regulating the insurance industry and malpractice itself, rather than malpractice awards.
Malpractice limits are only one part of a right-wing, business-led movement for general tort reform -- limiting awards for not just medical malpractice, but also for the manufacture of dangerous products and toxic chemicals. But as we've seen (most recently in the "popcorn lung" cases), with OSHA and EPA almost completely unable to adequately regulate the safety of chemicals, lawsuits are the only way to control the use of toxic chemicals.
Authors of articles for a special edition of an international scientific journal, Clinics in Occupational and Environmental Medicine.have decided to withdraw their articles after the journal publisher, Elsevier, announced that it would block an article claiming that large numbers of IBM workers have died prematurely of cancers and other diseases due to their exposures at IBM facilities.
Dr Joe LaDou, of the University of California at San Francisco, who tried to publish the paper, said the study was an important work that reveals the serious health risks facing workers in the computing industry. He has bitterly attacked the decision to block the paper and has been backed by all other contributors to Clinics in Occupational and Environmental Medicine. They have demanded that all their papers for that issue be withdrawn until the publisher relents.
'By standing together we can bring attention to the heavy-handed tactics that industry employs to prevent the publication of important scientific discovery,' he said.
I have written previously (here, here and here) about trials of former IBM employees which sought to prove that the computer company was responsible for their diseases.
As a result of the lawsuits, IBM was forced to turn over its employee mortality records which were analyzed by Richard Clapp, of Boston University, and his colleague Rebecca Johnson. The judge would not allow their study to be admitted as evidence in the trial, which IBM won, but La Dou invited them to submit it for publication.
Their analysis showed IBM employees suffered significantly more deaths from several kinds of cancer than would be expected from the general population. This trend was particularly strong for workers at IBM's chip-manufacturing plants, the current issue of Nature reveals.
Nathan Newman reports on a recent NLRB decision (where NLRB, which formerly stood for National Labor Relations Board, now stands for No Labor Rights Board). For the last 70 or so years, the National Labor Relations Act was supposed to protect the rights of all workers, not just those represented by unions. But no more.
As Nathan explains:
Here's the core of the decision. In 1975, the Supreme Court declared that anyone meeting with a supervisor where they thought they might be fired or disciplined had the right to a labor representative there to act as a witness. In 1982, the NLRB decided this right applied to workers in non-union settings who had a right to a fellow worker there in a similar role. Three years later, the now-Reagan dominated board reversed that decision. But in 2000, in what was called the Epilepsy Foundation decision, the Clinton labor board restored the original right non-union workers had to a witness when they may be fired. This interpretation of the labor law was upheld as valid even by the often anti-union DC Circuit Court of Appeals in 2001.
But the Bush board in a new decision, I.B.M. Corp., killed that right for non-union workers, allowing employers to discipline them without witnesses or moral support.
What's most astonishing to me is one of the reasons the Board used to justify this decision:
We simply observe that some employers, faced with security concerns that are an out-growth of the troubled times in which we live, may seek to question employees on a private basis for a host of legitimate reasons...
Huh? In other words, so for security reasons (e.g. terrorism), employers have the right to "question employees on a private basis." In other words, because of 9/11, non-union employees must give up their right to be accompanied by a co-worker. Are al Qaeda cells lurking in American workplaces? Does the NLRB fear that critical national security information will be transmitted directly from a disciplinary meeting to Osama bin Laden?
Well if it's a threat to homeland security for a non-union employee to be accompanied by a co-worker, why isn't it a threat to the homeland for organized workers to be accompanied by a union representative?
In fact, it's not large step to deciding that unions themselves are a threat to national security. Oops, the Bush administration has already decided unions in some government agencies may be a security reisk "in these troubled times" and has even used the war on terrorism as an excuse not to give federal employees raises.
What's good for the (federal) goose, may also be good for the (private sector) gander.
Houston County Coroner Danny Galpin says 48-year-old Willie Gray -- an employee of Premium Roofing Services -- died Thursday of heat stroke while working on a re-roofing project for the plant.
He says 57-year-old Larry Bryant -- a safety supervisor for Perdue Farms -- died the same day of heart disease after he climbed on the roof and ran to Gray, who had collapsed.
One Officer Killed, Another Hurt in Standoff
GRAND PRAIRIE, Texas — A 20-year Navy veteran who received a medical discharge three years ago told his parents this week that they would never see him again. Two days later, Timothy Joe Irwin was dead after shooting two police officers who had gone to a Wal-Mart parking lot to check on a blue camper-style van that he was in.
Sgt. Gregory Hunter, 54, died Friday, but Officer Bruce Seix managed to fire a few rounds before he was wounded, and those shots killed Irwin, said Grand Prairie detective John Brimmer.
Electric shock kills 1 worker, hurts another at plastics plant
FREMONT, OH - An employee at a Fremont plastics plant was killed and another worker was hurt by electric shock yesterday as they worked on a piece of equipment, authorities said. Matthew von Eitzen, 31, of Fremont died at Fremont Memorial Hospital, where he was taken after the accident at Plastics Group Inc., 2101 Cedar St.
Fremont fire Capt. Marvin Wagner said the men were shocked by about 480 volts."They were working on changing the lower part of a mold and a top section fell out," he said.
Captain Wagner said a metal platform the men were standing on apparently became electrified during the incident. Fremont fire Capt. Marvin Wagner said the men were shocked by about 480 volts.
"They were working on changing the lower part of a mold and a top section fell out," he said. Captain Wagner said a metal platform the men were standing on apparently became electrified during the incident.
Construction worker killed at SeaTac Airport
A 52-year-old worker was killed yesterday in a construction area of the third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
The Bellingham man, whose name was not released, was killed about 5:30 p.m. when a brush-cutting machine threw a piece of debris through the operator's shield, striking him in the head, said Bob Parker, airport spokesman.
Sheet Metal Worker Killed In Fall
Those who knew Ricky Sugg say they will always remember his winning smile, his caring way and, most of all, his pride in his family.
Jack Brouse, 52, was from Zion, Ill. He had been a ride mechanic at the amusement park for six years.
A Six Flags security report said Brouse apparently "stepped into the path of one of the cars in an attempt to get to the other side" of the tracks, and a speeding roller coaster car hit him in the head.
After badly burning his hands in a coal-mining accident earlier this year in Perry County, Edwin Pennington said he was finished with mining work, but he returned for the money, his father said yesterday.
On Wednesday night, Pennington, 25, of Harlan County, was crushed to death in a rock fall at a Bell County Coal Corp. mine — one of two underground mining deaths hours apart in Eastern Kentucky.
Eric Chaney, 26, of Pike County, was crushed in a roof collapse early yesterday at a Dags Branch Coal Corp. mine in Fedscreek in Pike County, officials said.
The deaths were the second and third fatal mining accidents in Kentucky this year, and the first underground fatalities. Nationally, 14 miners have died in accidents this year.
Bill Caylor, president of the Kentucky Coal Association, an industry group, said the two deaths were unavoidable accidents. "We don't want things like this to happen, but they will," Caylor said. "Mining is very safe, but you have to be careful because you're working around big pieces of equipment."
The officers were killed Thursday when they went to the apartment house with a fourth officer to arrest Nathaniel Lauell Woods on a misdemeanor domestic assault warrant, said Police Chief Annetta Nunn. The fourth officer was not injured.
The deaths marked the third time in just over a year that two or more police officers have been gunned down in Alabama.
Chief deputy coroner Jay Glass identified the slain officers as Harley Chisholm III, 40; Charles Robert Bennett, 33; and Carlos Owen, 58. Owen had been on the force for 26 years.
Chisholm and Owen were found dead in the rear of the house, Glass said, and Bennett's body was outside the front of the home. All three officers were shot multiple times.
David Torres, an employee of BFI Waste Systems, was sweeping the road to the Tessman Road landfill in the 7000 block of Interstate 10 when his sweeper was hit from behind. The driver of the Texas Waste Systems truck said dust kicked up from the sweeper obscured his view.
The sweeper went into a nearby ditch — throwing Torres into the road — and the truck driver told police he couldn't stop before running over the man.
2 Die in Tractor-Trailer Collision
Traffic was snarled for several hours yesterday on Interstate 81 south of Martinsburg, W.Va., after two tractor-trailers collided, exploded and caught fire, killing two people, the Berkeley County Sheriff's Department said.
The collision occurred about 8:15 a.m. when a tractor-trailer heading south crossed the median into the northbound lane and struck the other vehicle, Cpl. Willie Johnson said. The names of the victims were not immediately released.
Construction worker killed by falling slab
A Los Angeles construction worker died Thursday after a slab of concrete fell on him during an office renovation project in Oxnard, authorities said.
John Nelson, 48, sustained massive trauma to his head and neck and was pronounced dead at UMass Memorial Marlborough Hospital just after 8 p.m., about 90 minutes after the blast, police said.
Hudson police Captain David Stephens said Nelson was alone at the time of the accident. Paramedics found Nelson unconscious but with a faint pulse.
Stephens said Nelson's welding flame seemed to have cut through the top of the 55-gallon drum that the sheet metal was resting on, sparking the blast. It is unclear whether the pressure of the sealed drum or oil residue caused the explosion, Stephens said. More here.
One Dead At Jim Walter Mine In Alabama
Second Death At Mine In Past Two Months
BROOKWOOD, Ala. -- A veteran miner was killed Wednesday while working underground at Jim Walter Resources' Mine No. 7 in Brookwood, the second death at the mine in two months. Kenneth D. Battles, 45, of Vance, was near an underground coal storage area when he died at 9:50 a.m. Preliminary reports indicate he became trapped between a steel beam and a rail car used to transport coal, the company said in a statement.
Battles began working for Jim Walter Resources in 1981. He is survived by his wife, Deborah, and two sons. Co-workers who knew Battles best said they would miss the man they nicknamed "Son-in-Law."
Another fatality occurred at the mine two months ago. Gary Wayne Keeton, 57, of Nauvoo, was found dead April 23 after being carried to the surface of the mine by a conveyor, passing through a section that breaks down coal.
Hospital Worker Dies from T-B
Chesapeake, Virginia -- A hospital worker in Virginia has died of tuberculosis. State health officials said they're trying to reach people who may have come in contact with the Virginia Beach woman. She worked at Chesapeake General Hospital's orthopedic surgical unit from October 2003 through April sixth of this year.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, T-B is a disease caused by a bacteria and spreads through the air from one person to another when a person with T-B coughs or sneezes.
Health officials say several hundred people may have been exposed to the disease. So far two of the woman's relatives and two hospital employees have tested positive for T-B.
Worker Dies After Fall From Second-Story Window In Greenwich
GREENWICH, Conn. -- Federal safety officials are investigating the death of a construction worker who fell from a second-floor window at an unfinished house Tuesday morning.
Police declined to identify the worker.
The man was working near a window at the front of the unfinished stone mansion at about 10:30 a.m. when he fell about 20 feet and struck his head, police told the Greenwich Times.
Injured worker dies
Albany, NY -- A worker severely burned in an explosion in Malta last month has died.
Steven Comorski of Mechanicville died Sunday afternoon. He and three other employees of the Wright-Malta Corporation were dismantling a warehouse on May 17 when a torch they were using set off an explosion. They were taken to the burn unit at Westchester Medical Center.
State police said the men were using the torch to cut through a pipe that was believed to have contained wood grain alcohol residue. More here and here.
1 worker dies, 1 injured after fall at Radford pump station
The workers, whom authorities have not identified, were running new electrical cabling at the Peppers Ferry Regional Wastewater Treatment Authority's Radford pump station when the accident occurred. They worked for Greensboro, N.C.-based Bryant Electrical Co., whose officials declined to comment on the incident Tuesday afternoon. Authorities in Radford said it would be up to the company to release the victims' names.
The men fell an unspecified distance from the first floor of the pump station into the basement, which houses its pumps, according to wastewater authority director Clarke Wallcraft. Electrical companies are required to meet a variety of state safety regulations that cover everything from testing the air's oxygen content in confined spaces to maintaining and wearing proper fall protection equipment, according to Jim Mann, regional director of the labor and industry department
While crushing stones into a new trail a steamroller got caught on the edge and rolled over pinning and killing the driver, 52-year-old Richard Parker. Now the Sheriff's Department is trying to figure out how the accident happened.
The accident occurred about 3:45 a.m. on the tracks about three miles east of Union Station in New Haven, according to Vernae Grahm, a spokeswoman for Amtrak. Grahm said the train was a Connecticut Department of Transportation test train with an Amtrak conductor and engineer on board. The train struck a crane that was involved in a repair project on the nearby Interstate 95 overpass.
Worker dies in Wilder meat plant
NAMPA, ID -- A Homedale man died Monday morning at a food processing plant located on Highway 95 north of Wilder.
Canyon County Coroner Vickie DeGeus-Morris examined the body Monday afternoon. She said Sanchez' death was the result of him being pinned in such a way that he could not breathe. Sanchez also suffered several cuts to the legs, back and back of the head.But DeGeus-Morris said some of those wounds were inflicted after Sanchez had already died.
An auger is a large cutting device used to channel meat in an upward motion from one area to another. It is set inside a half-tube about 18 inches wide and is placed at about a 30-degree angle. Meat is cut up as it is transferred.
Aquila Worker Electrocuted In St. Joseph
ST. JOSEPH, Mo. -- A worker with Aquila Inc. was killed Monday when he came into contact with a live power line, according to the power company. The incident happened around 3 p.m. in the 4200 block of Huntoon Road, where crews were working to restore power lost in recent storms.
The Aquila employee, Kit Randel, 32, had been with the company since 2002.
Officer killed on job praised
GRAPEVINE -- A Grapevine police officer who was hit and killed by a suspected drunken driver was remembered Monday as a man deeply committed to keeping the roads free of impaired drivers.
Darren Medlin's death was captured on videotape just after 2:30 a.m. Saturday by a camera in his patrol car. Medlin was standing beside a Ford Mustang he had pulled over in Euless, near the Grapevine border, when he was hit by a car driven by Roy Alvin Adams Jr., 27, authorities said.
Medlin, the first Grapevine police officer killed on duty since the department was formed in 1956, was thrown about 50 yards and later pronounced dead.
Officials said the 46-year-old machinist, whose name was being withheld, was cutting the bearing at Kingsbury Bearings Inc. shortly before 11 a.m. Sunday when it broke loose from the cutting machine, striking him on the chest and legs.
The victim was taken to Frankford-Torresdale Hospital, where he was pronounced dead at 11:42 a.m., police said.
Worker dies after falling into furnace
GREENVILLE, S.C. -- A worker at a Laurens County plant has died after he fell into a furnace while he was tossing in scrap wood to burn.
Raymond Lowman, 77, of Clinton, died Saturday morning after he fell into a furnace that powers steam machines at Anderson Hardwood Floors, Laurens County Coroner Nick Nichols said.
An autopsy Sunday indicated Lowman may have blacked out and suffered a heart attack before falling into the furnace, Nichols said.
Construction Worker Killed In Freak Accident
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- A construction worker was killed Friday in a freak accident while he was on the job.
The crew was working on private property at the 6000 block of San Jose Boulevard Friday morning when a truck got stuck in mud. Workers used a tractor to pull the truck out, and in the process, the truck was somehow pulled over the victim.
State And Federal Agencies Investigate Fatal Construction Accident
Rescue workers on the scene said they spent as much as 45 minutes trying to save William Shearn, who was pinned underneath the 1,500 pound bucket of a backhoe that was digging out the trench. The work was being done there to build new water pipe for Cincinnati water works.
Early Thursday afternoon, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration admitted it was looking into two major aspects of the accident.
"One would be whether the bucket came off the excavator. The other issue is whether the trench was adequately shored and sloped in accordance with OSHA regulations," said Richard Gilgrist, Safety and Health Administration.
Shearn was one of six men working on the trench for the water pipe. Indications are the backhoe's bucket somehow fell off and hit Shearn in the back, pinning him in the trench. OSHA said it is worried about the backhoe bucket becoming detached for some time even issuing special advisories about the problem. "Across the United States, there have been a number of fatalities in that past 3 to 5 years, that have involved separation of the bucket from the excavation arms," said Gilgrist.
A check of OSHA records from 1999 finds the company involved, Reynolds Complete Industrial of Orleans, Indiana has been fined thousands of dollars for numerous serious violations on its trench operations. More here.
Grader operator dies in Sandusky mishap
SANDUSKY - A 45-year-old northwest Ohio construction worker died after he was run over by the grader tractor he was operating at the new Cold Creek Crossing subdivision Wednesday evening.
Todd M. Jones, an employee of Underground Utilities Inc. in Monroeville, Ohio, jumped off the tractor to try to restart it after it stalled, according to Sandusky Police Chief Robert Runner.
But the tractor was still in gear and when it started, it felled him and passed over his chest, Dr. Tom Nesgoda, Erie County coroner, said.
The first industrial death this year in York County was May 26, when Bradley Dean Hahn, 43, of York, fell more than 30 feet onto a concrete floor at the site of a William Penn Senior High School construction project in York. He was a mason for Caretti Inc. of Camp Hill.
The second was Wednesday when William Oberdick III, 40, of North Codorus Township, was crushed in a conveyor system at W.R. Meadows of PA, Inc., in West Manchester Township.
The out-of-county death was at a Reading automotive battery manufacturing plant. A man there was splashed with sulfuric acid and died after a lengthy hospital stay, Fink said.
Television station employee dies
Funeral services will be Friday for a photojournalist for a Bryan-College Station television station who was electrocuted while covering a story about a gas well explosion.
Matt Moore, 23, of Temple, was setting up for a live shot about 6 p.m. Tuesday in Hearne when he was killed.
Relatives said strong winds probably contributed to Monday's death of Lonnie Jowers, 41, of Buffalo Gap. David Breneman, his brother-in-law and co-worker, said Jowers was working on a narrow catwalk at the time of the accident.
Cape construction worker killed by power saw
CAPE CORAL, FL — The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration is expected to investigate the death of a Cape Coral construction worker.
Two men died at the scene, while another was flown to a Melbourne hospital with critical injuries, Frith said. A fourth man was in serious condition Wednesday afternoon at an area hospital. Frith said one of the men who died was thrown from the van, while another was apparently dragged from the wreck by other passengers when they thought the van might catch fire.
None of the men had driver's licenses and only a few had any identification. U.S immigration authorities will help sort out the men's identities. Most were from Guatemala but lived and worked in Palm Beach County, picking peppers and doing other agriculture work, Frith said. The victims' names were not released.
The accident came two months after a van rollover crash in nearby Fort Pierce killed nine migrant farmworkers on their way home from work in citrus groves. In that crash, a 15-passenger van with 19 men rolled over and ejected every passenger. Driver Salvador Leon was arrested May 20 by the Florida Highway Patrol on a charge of driving with a suspended license.
“Something gave way in the boom and the bucket toppled,” said Chief Deputy Dusty Rhodes of the Williamson County Sheriff’s Department. “He was wearing a safety harness and he was caught in the fork of the tree. That’s what kept him from falling all the way to the ground.”
The man, whose name has not been released, was working in a crew of three to cut several tree limbs that had grown too close to power lines near a group of four homes just off Clovercroft Road. The crew — which included the man’s younger brother, Tyrone — was employed through Seelbach and Company Inc. out of Lawrenceville, Ga.
Worker killed on Holly Springs construction site
A construction worker was killed Tuesday morning at a sewer project in Cherokee County, authorities said.
Emanuel Fuentes, 25, of Cumming, died in an accident about 8:30 a.m. on Old Highway 5 near Sixes Road, said Cherokee County sheriff's Deputy Nicole Combs.
Jennifer Givner, a spokeswoman for the city's Building Department, said the workers were digging a trench along a 6-foot-high foundation when the wall fell on top of them.
Building inspectors issued a violation to the owner and developer of the site, Yong Fa Chi, for failing to provide shoring, sheeting and bracing during an excavation, Givner said. She said the site had no previous violations. The owner could not be reached for comment.
Officer Shot In Line Of Duty Laid To Rest
MYERSTOWN, Pa. -- Hundreds of people turned out Tuesday for the funeral of a slain Reading policeman.
The funeral for Patrolman Michael Wise was held Tuesday at Grace Bretheren New Beginnings Church in Myerstown, Lebanon County. Wise, who was the son of a retired Lebanon police officer, who was shot in the course of his work Friday night and died early Saturday.
Local worker electrocuted
OPP, AL -A local Gallion resident was killed by electrocution on Thursday shortly before 7:50 a.m., while on the job in Opp, Alabama. William Charles Watt, 31, of Gallion was working with a company that was building a 350-foot cellular telephone tower when he was killed.
Investigator Junior Anderson of the Opp Police Department said Watt was working with a company called Webb Tower, who was in the process of building a new cellular telephone tower near the North Jackson Street extension.
Police had identified a suspect but didn’t know why Officer Mark Sawyers was shot, police Chief Barnett Jones said at a news conference in this Detroit suburb. No one had been arrested by midday Saturday.
“It was a very bold, calculated and cold murder,” said Capt. David Vinson.
Sawyers, 30, had just finished investigating a traffic accident Friday evening and had parked at a shopping center to complete his paperwork when a man fired a shotgun at him from another vehicle, Lt. Michael Reese said.
March 25, 1911: Fire breaks out in Triangle Shirtwaist Factory in New York City. 146 workers, mostly young women, die because fire exits are locked to prevent workers from stealing materials.
September 3, 1991: A fire in the Imperial chicken processing plant in Hamlet, N.C., kills 25 workers, mostly women on minimum wage. Management had locked the fire escapes, fearing workers would steal chickens.
David Sandoval, who cleans the floors of the Met Foods Supermarket in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn, walks in through the front door most evenings around 8:30. But when the gates come down an hour later, he says, the door is locked, and he is unable to leave until the manager comes in the next morning.
Zeferino Arenas Abundez, who scrubs and waxes floors at a Pioneer supermarket in Clinton Hill, says much the same thing happens to him most nights.
Indeed, he said that when smoke set off the fire alarm at one supermarket he used to clean in the Bronx, firefighters had to saw through a large lock to get in.
Interviews with janitors, state officials and local organizers who work with immigrants indicate that the experiences of these men and many others are part of a hidden threat in dozens of stores across the city, where concerns about theft trump worries about the fate of workers.
To prevent workers from stealing merchandise, they say, many stores padlock their rear fire exits, even as the front doors are sealed behind steel gates.
The Fifth Avenue Committee, a community group in Brooklyn that has helped immigrants for years, says it has taken similar accounts from 11 immigrants who work in Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan and the Bronx who say much the same thing goes on at some of the most familiar groceries in the city. The group has identified more than 30 stores that lock cleaning workers in at night.
The New York Times ran an article earlier this year about Wal-Mart locking in workers at night. Wal-Mart claimed that workers were locked in to protect them from crime in dangerous neighborhoods, but former Wal-Mart managers said the lock-ins were intended to prevent theft.
In this case, those who do not choose to remember the past should be condemned -- to prison.
Chesapeake, Virginia-AP -- A hospital worker in Virginia has died of tuberculosis.
State health officials said they're trying to reach people who may have come in contact with the Virginia Beach woman. She worked at Chesapeake General Hospital's orthopedic surgical unit from October 2003 through April sixth of this year.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, T-B is a disease caused by a bacteria and spreads through the air from one person to another when a person with T-B coughs or sneezes.
Health officials say several hundred people may have been exposed to the disease. So far two of the woman's relatives and two hospital employees have tested positive for T-B.
Good article in Newsdayhere on immigrant workers' deaths in New York after the death of Jian Quo Shen (yes, he did have a name) that I wrote about last week.
Shen was part of a growing cadre of Chinese workers who find work in construction by answering small newspaper ads or gather on Flushing street corners to wait for employers.
The list of the dead also includes several Mexicans, a Brazilian, an Ecuadoran and a Jamaican. The majority of day laborers whose main income comes from construction jobs are Latinos.
Most of the day laborers are undocumented immigrants and therefore are often forced to work in underground jobs under harsh conditions. Advocates say that sometimes, after a long work day, immigrants are not paid their agreed-upon wages or are abandoned by employers without pay.
While researching the article on Ronald Reagan’s legacy, I ran across this excellent 1998 article from the Houston Chronicle about the almost insurmountable barriers to protecting workers against chemicals in this country.
What’s the problem?
Constrained by politics and often overmatched by industry, OSHA has managed to tighten standards for only 26 of an estimated 650,000 chemicals and chemical mixtures to which U.S. workers are exposed. Some on this long list are known to be dangerous; others have not been studied.
Industry challenges of proposed limits, backed by industry-funded science, are the norm. Proof is demanded, then more proof. Years, maybe decades, pass.
Chemical industry leaders say it's not necessarily a bad thing for regulation to take time, given the costs and difficulties of compliance.
"It is slow and cumbersome, but that's the way our system of government was established," said C. T. "Kip" Howlett Jr., a vice president with the Chemical Manufacturers Association and executive director of the Chlorine Chemistry Council.
OSHA Director Eula Bingham tried to address the problem in the 1970’s, but along came Ronald Reagan:
Carter brought in Eula Bingham, a university professor from Cincinnati, to run the agency, and Bingham was motivated. The 1970s already had seen two occupational health catastrophes, one involving asbestos, the other vinyl chloride.
Thousands of workers had developed cancers foretold by studies of the two substances. Warnings had been ignored, and more disease seemed inevitable if something wasn't done.
One of Bingham's main missions, as she saw it, was to adopt a workplace cancer policy that would enable OSHA to move quickly against a suspect chemical once a reasonable burden of proof had been met.
Supported by a young, aggressive staff - and a 1978 federal report estimating that 20 percent of all cancers were caused by on-the-job exposures - Bingham prevailed in January of 1980.
Under what became known as the OSHA generic carcinogen policy, companies that made or used toxic chemicals faced the prospect of swift, strict regulation. Gross epidemiological evidence - a body count - no longer would be necessary to elicit a government response. Convincing animal data would do.
"I took so much heat on that," Bingham, now back at the University of Cincinnati, recently recalled.
All for naught, as it happened. By 1981, Carter and Bingham were out, and so was the policy.
"It didn't go anywhere," Bingham said. "All activity stopped."
And, of course, workers are the first ones to suffer. Peter Infante, former director of OSHA's Office of Standards Review (also mentioned in the Reagan article below)
By and large, Infante believes, blue-collar workers - the men and women who develop most of the chronic diseases and suffer most of the traumatic injuries - generate little interest or sympathy.
"In the early 1900s," he wrote in a 1995 article, "canaries were routinely taken down into the mines. When the canaries passed out or died, the men knew that there was a problem with exposure to carbon monoxide and immediate action was needed. The analogy here is clear. Blue-collar workers appear to be the canaries in our society for identifying human chemical carcinogens in the general environment."
Infante noted in the article that 21 of 22 chemicals recognized as lung carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer were first identified through studies of workers. More than half of all IARC carcinogens were spotted in this fashion, he wrote, yet apathy persists.
The answer, of course is to stop treating all chemicals as if they’re innocent until proven guilty by the illness or death of workers. This is the goal of the European REACH initiative.
But of course, to do that we need to elect a President and Congress that doesn’t believe (or isn’t beholden to) the crap spewing out of the chemical industry.
contrasts with the approach taken by the Bush administration in February, when the Environmental Protection Agency approved an industry-backed rule intended to spare timber-product plants from strict formaldehyde emission controls.
In doing so, the EPA adopted a far more lenient assessment of formaldehyde risk.
Administration critics Tuesday characterized the international health group's action as a rebuke to the EPA's handling of the matter. At the same time, an industry representative downplayed the international decision, noting that the reclassification of formaldehyde was not a finding of actual risk.
Some were critical of the Bush administration
The Bush administration is out of step with the international community on yet another important issue for public health and the environment," said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Los Angeles). "It appears that EPA's recent plywood rule downplayed or disregarded scientific information that the World Health Organization finds to be credible and strong."
A prominent epidemiologist went further.
"If the leading international agency on cancer has reevaluated the data and declared formaldehyde to be a human carcinogen, it no longer seems right for the EPA and the White House to ignore these data," said David Michaels, who was assistant Energy secretary for environment, safety and health in the Clinton administration.
One worker killed and one injured in an apparent confined space incident and the first explanation our of the Virginia OSHA representative’s mouth is that it could have been “employee misconduct.” Sheesh!
It looks like a couple of contractors were running electrical cabling at a wastewater plant pump station when they were overcome by toxic vapors and fell from the first floor into the basement.
Here’s what Virginia OSHA said:
Electrical companies are required to meet a variety of state safety regulations that cover everything from testing the air's oxygen content in confined spaces to maintaining and wearing proper fall protection equipment, according to Jim Mann, regional director of the labor and industry department.
"Sometimes you can have all the required guards and someone can still circumvent them and have an accident," Mann said. "Employee misconduct is an affirmative defense if the company has met all the requirements."
(Note: This is long. If you click on the Posted 10:41 PM above, a printable version of this article only will come up)
Reagan was dead: to begin with. There is no doubt whatever about that.
According to the "official" hagiography, Ronald Reagan had single-handedly defeated the Soviet Union and ended the Cold War. And in his spare time he revitalized the American economy by cutting taxes and ending the era of big government whose regulations were slowly strangling the free market, free will and liberty itself. And he did it all with great humor and affability.
Of course, one's definition of “liberty” and “freedom” may differ depending on whether you are interested in freedom to run your business as you want, or freedom to enjoy safe working conditions and to come home from work alive. Ronald Reagan and his followers clearly defined liberty differently than most working people and it was his version of liberty that led to the Reagan regulatory reform policies that effectively took away the right of American workers to work in a safe workplace.
William Greider observes in the current Nation remembers that "a chilling meanness lurked at the core of Reagan's political agenda (always effectively concealed by the affability), and he used this meanness like a razor blade to advance his main purpose--delegitimizing the federal government."
Getting a grip on runaway federal regulation was one of Ronald Reagan's many significant achievements as president. But, media tributes since his death have scarcely mentioned President Reagan's efforts at regulatory reform.
Former Oil Chemical and Atomic Workers (OCAW) attorney and staff representative Steve Wodka agrees that this part Reagan's legacy has been neglected, although he differs somewhat on the "significance" of Reagan's "achievement:"
Ronald Reagan and his administration cost hundreds of thousands of workers to needlessly suffer death and injuries on the job and shortened their lives from preventable occupational diseases. His direct attack on workers by firing the air controllers is well-known. His destruction of OSHA and the set backs that he caused in the field of worker health and safety are hardly known beyond our immediate group.
His view of OSHA was summed up in a piece that he wrote for the Conservative Digest in October, 1975: "'OSHA' is a four-letter word that's giving businessmen fits."
OK, then, lets look at Reagan's "achievements".
First, you should understand that this is my history of the Ronald Reagan years at OSHA -- with a bit of help from my friends. If you want the official history, you can read the fifth (and final) chapter of the Department of Labor's official history of OSHA entitled: Thorne Auchter Administration, 1981-1984: "Oh, what a (regulatory) relief" (The entire official DOL history of OSHA's first twelve years can be found here.)
Second, there is far more that can be said about the effect of Ronald Reagan on the American workplace than I can write here. If you want to contribute to this story, make free use of the “Comments” link at the end, or I’d be glad to publish any longer pieces as separate articles.
The newly elected administration of Ronald Reagan lost no time in putting its imprint on OSHA. Wodka remembers that:
Within 9 days of taking office, on January 29, 1981, Reagan froze all federal regulations that had not become effective.
On February 10, 1981, the U. S. Chamber of Commerce submitted a list of 10 OSHA rulemakings to Reagan's Task Force on Regulatory Reform which should be "prevented," including a proposal to reduce the permissible limit for asbestos exposure. Eleven days later, Reagan's Budget Director, David Stockman, announced that the proposed asbestos rulemaking would be rescinded.
According to the official DOL history:
These included proposals to amend the hearing regulations and the cancer policy and to require the labeling of hazardous substances (the "right-to-know" proposal). To begin implementing the longer term aspects of Regulatory Relief, Auchter quickly appointed special "task groups" to study existing rules on lead, cotton dust and noise and to develop a new labeling proposal.
Instead of looking for someone to head OSHA who actually had a background in health and safety, Reagan chose construction executive Thorne Auchter. According to the official history:
In February 1981 President Reagan announced that he would nominate Thorne G. Auchter for that post. Auchter was the 35-year-old executive vice president of Auchter Co., a family-owned construction firm based in Jacksonville, Florida. He had served in President Reagan's 1980 election campaign as special events director for Florida.
Former OSHA scientist Peter Infante was present at the creation of the Reagan/Auchter administration and quickly became the symbol for Auchter of all that was wrong with OSHA, leading to an attempt for fire him for insubordination. As Infante remembers it:
The early Reagan administration (Auchter) also embargoed the joint OSHA/NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin on formaldehyde that had been signed by the head of OSHA and NIOSH at the end of the Carter Administration. The Formaldehyde Institute did not want information about the cancer causing properties of formaldehyde released.
The Reagan Administration also proposed to fire me for writing to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (on Agency letterhead) that its review of formaldehyde incorrectly concluded that there was "limited evidence" in experimental animals that formaldehyde caused cancer. OSHA and NIOSH had already concluded there was sufficient evidence of cancer and hence were about to publish the Health Information Bulletin (HIB) on formaldehyde at the end of the Carter Administration.
At the time the Deputy Dir of OSHA (Mark Cowan, who joined the Agency from the CIA) met with John Byington of the Formaldehyde Institute and they then concluded that the experimental evidence for formaldehyde to cause cancer in animals was "flawed." Albert Gore, then in the House, held 2 days of oversight hearings on OSHA's firing me. A month after the hearings, the Agency said it could not find any evidence that I was "insubordinate" or that I "misrepresented" the Agency's scientific position on formaldehyde. Thus, the charges against me were dropped.
Months later, the agency was told it could not withhold the distribution of the HIB since the government had paid for the printing of it.
It also probably did not help OSHA’s case that they attached the letter from the Formaldehyde Institute complaining about Infante to the letter of dismissal.
One of Auchter's first actions was straight out of Fahrenheit 451 (Ray Bradbury's classic named after the temperature at which a book will burn.) The Reagan administration began the day before the recently issued Cotton Dust standard was heard at the Supreme Court. For the business community, the cotton dust standard was symbolic of all that was wrong with Eula Bingham's OSHA, and government regulation in general.
A week after his arrival, Auchter was shocked to find that the cover of an OSHA publication on Cotton Dust displayed a photograph by Earl Dotter of a cotton dust victim, Louis Harrell. Auchter, believing the cover to be inflammatory, ordered the remaining publications destroyed and reissued the document with no photo on the cover.
The "official" DOL history has a slightly different take on the story:
When he [Auchter] learned that the agency was about to publish separate booklets on the cotton dust hazard - one version for workers and another for employers - he temporarily withdrew them because he felt that having separate booklets was divisive. Five days later, a unified booklet was released that contained essentially the same information, but in the meantime organized labor leveled a barrage of criticism at Auchter - the first of many - over the withdrawal.
Auchter also tried to repeal the hierarchy of controls which states that respirators (and other personal protective equipment) should be the last strategy and engineering controls the first. Infante recalls that:
Auchter was in favor of putting workers in respirators instead of lowering PELs for substances that standards were being developed for like EtO, arsenic, certain sectors for the cotton dust standard, benzene, cadmium, etc. We in Health Standards along with the Solicitor of Labor's office had to argue with him that the OSHA Act required engineering controls for the first line of defense against toxic substances in the workplace.
Medical removal protection triggers for blood lead levels in the lead standard were another target of the Reagan administration. OSHA wanted workers' blood lead levels to fall to a certain level before the workers were allowed back in the workplace, but the lead industry claimed that levels would never fall that low. In a tribute to their creativity, the industry further claimed that keeping these veteran workers off the job would create safety hazards because they were the most knowledgeable about workplace safety.
Ethylene Oxide was one of the first new standards that Reagan's OSHA worked on:
In April 1983 Ethylene Oxide (ETO) became the first chemical since 1978 for which OSHA proposed to lower allowable exposure levels. ETO is a gas used primarily as a sterilizer in hospitals and was one of the substances regulated in OSHA's old consensus standards. In August 1981 the Health Research Group and several unions petitioned OSHA to set an emergency standard for ETO to protect an estimated 100,000 workers in hospitals and elsewhere from possible damage to chromosomes. When OSHA refused their petition, they sued in a federal court.
The court eventually ordered OSHA to issue a standard within one year.
According to the DOL history, Peter Infante again played the troublemaker:
OSHA decided whether or not to set a ceiling for short-duration exposures [Short Term Exposure Limit or STEL] after a brief "memo war" between Peter Infante, who thought a short-term level was needed, and Leonard Vance, who did not. Infante lost and the short-duration maximum was omitted from the proposal, much to organized labor's disappointment. Hearings were held in July 1983.
The official history doesn't finish the story, however. When it came time to write the final standard, the public comments on the proposal and testimony at the public hearing so overwhelmingly proved the need for a STEL, that OSHA included it in the "final" version sent to OMB as the court-ordered deadline approached. OMB was not amused and, at the last minute, ordered OSHA to remove the STEL along with any justification in the preamble. Facing a deadline only hours away and not looking forward to contempt-of-court charges, the staff was ordered to take a marker and literally cross through any reference to the STEL. The inexpertly crossed-through document was then delivered to the Federal Register, to be retrieved later as part of a successful court challenge to the rule.
But, that's still not the end of the story. Months later, a House committee hauled OSHA to a hearing studying the development of the standard and the missing STEL. Accusations were made that Director of Health Standards, R. Leonard Vance, had met illegally with representatives of the Ethylene Oxide Industry Council.
Vance denied the charge and was asked to produce his calendar. He consented, but later was reluctantly forced to inform Congress that he had taken his records on a hunting trip and his dogs, after apparently feasting on bad bunny rabbit, vomited on them, forcing him to discard the putrid records before they could be delivered to Congress.
Though the Reagan administration is remembered most vividly for cutting agency budgets, eliminating rules and creating a task force to scrutinize regulations that the administration and business wanted to change, regulatory experts say the real effect of those years can be traced to a change in the process of creating rules.
Within weeks of taking office in 1981, the Reagan administration issued an executive order that, for the first time, set up a system of reviewing all of the rules issued by dozens of federal agencies. The Feb. 17 order set out a protocol of review and cost-and-benefit analysis that laid the groundwork for the way that the federal regulatory system works today. It replaced a much looser system of consultation where previous administrations reviewed some but not all rules.
The result was a kind of deregulation that did not depend so much on removing regulatory barriers for entire industries, as the Carter administration did for airlines in 1978. Instead, it used administrative tools that sometimes made it harder for federal agencies to issue rules as their regulatory agendas became subject to strict oversight by the White House.
In the early 1970's, it took about six months to two years for the agency to develop and issue major rules such as those on asbestos and vinyl chloride even though these rules were controversial and contentious. The preambles for the standards were only five to ten pages, but the standards, evidence and material were upheld by reviewing courts.
In the mid- to late-1970's, the process was somewhat longer, taking three years for the promulgation of the lead standard, four years for standards on cotton dust and arsenic, all major regulatory initiatives. But during that time the agency developed and issued numerous other standards including those as benzene, acrylonitrile, DBCP, cancer policy, access to exposure and medical records, hearing conservation, fire protection, and guarding of roof perimeters.
In the early 1980's, as a result of the anti-regulatory philosophy of the Reagan Administration, the time for standards development and issuance became even longer as action was only taken in response to Congressional mandates or court orders. For example, it took six years and a lawsuit for OSHA to issue its formaldehyde standard and five years and a Congressional mandate for the issuance of the blood borne pathogens standard.
Other standards initiated during the Reagan Administration took much longer. Standards on 1,3 butadiene, methylene chloride and respiratory protection each took 12 years from start to finish and were not completed until the Clinton Administration.
Most recently, we saw a situation where it took OSHA more than ten years to issue an Ergonomics standard. The regulatory language spanned a total of 8 pages in the Federal Register, while the "Preamble," containing extensive economic and regulatory analyses, went on for an additional 600 pages. Following issuance of the standard, industry association representatives inflamed their members with the specter of 600 page standard! The tragic irony is that the 600 page preamble that raised the ire of the Republicans and business community was largely a result of Republican and business community-inspired legislation and Executive Orders endlessly increasing the amount of analysis required to justify a standard.
Reagan's OSHA Budget
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), founded in 1970, saw its budget increase steadily from 1975 to 1981, and its staffing--the key to enforcement--rise from 1975 to 1980. But, during the Reagan years, it lost funding and people. Its staffing went from 2,951 in 1980 to 2,211 in 1987. Clinton increased spending on OSHA in the 1994 and 1995 fiscal-year budgets, but in fiscal year 1996, the Republican Congress forced the administration to agree to budget cuts and another reduction in staff. In the past two years, the administration has finally got the budget back up, but there are still fewer people working at OSHA in 2000 than there were in 1975, even as OSHA's job has become more complex and demanding.
One of the goals of former construction industry executive Thorne Auchter was “the eradication of the "prevailing adversary spirit" among labor, management and government.” All of those inspections were clearly “adversarial,” especially for employers already doing the right thing. How to tell the “good” employers from the “bad?” Just check their injury and illness records before deciding whether to inspect. UNITE's Eric Frumin recalls Auchter's infamous "record check" inspections and the tragic consequences:
In July, 1981, OSHA Director Thorne Auchter, with the help of his new deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor Mark Cowan told his Regional Administrators that effective October 1, they would impose a new category of inspections on their inspectors -- the infamous "records-check" inspection - -which required inspectors to stop from entering the workplace if the plant's OSHA Log showed a below-average injury rate. Two years later, at the Film Recovery Corp. plant in Elk Grove, IL, an inspector did exactly that, and weeks later a worker died from arsenic poisoning. The Cook County Coroner ruled it a homicide because of the employer's blatant efforts to hide the arsenic hazard he spray-painted over the skull-and-crossbones warnings on the labels of hazardous chemicals). The Cook County State's Attorney (Richard Daley Jr.) prosecuted the first homicide case for a workplace fatality. The record check policy was finally reversed a couple of years later, as Bush I began to run for re-election and the scandal of cooked injury books was revealed in the Union Carbide inspection in W. VA. Thousands of inspections were wasted in the interim. So much for effective government.
A number of other actions taken by Auchter weakened OSHA's enforcement ability, according to the DOL history:
Inspectors began to cite fewer "serious" violations and greatly reduced the size of penalties assessed. OSHA instituted a new system for exempting firms with good safety records from safety inspections and targeting those with poor records. "General Duty" clause citations were restricted and the requirement for walkaround pay was dropped.
The walkaround pay repeal was particularly hard-hitting for workers. The OSHAct gives workers the right to "walk around" the workplace with OSHA inspectors. Until Reagan, this "walkaround right" was presumed to imply that workers should also be paid for the time spent walking around with the OSHA inspector. Reagan and Auchter took that right away. Workers still had the right to walk around, but no longer had the right to be paid for the time spent exercising that right.
One of main worker safety debates raging today is whether or how to get OSHA to pursue more criminal prosecutions and jail time against employers whose willful violation of the law causes the death or serious injury of a worker. According to NY Times investigative reporter David Barstow, much of OSHA's refusal to pursue more criminal prosecutions can be traced back to the administration of Ronald Reagan:
When people at OSHA explain their reluctance to pursue criminal prosecutions, they sometimes begin by pointing to the example of Ronald J. McCann.
Mr. McCann, acting regional administrator in Chicago during the early 1980's, was an early champion of criminal prosecutions. He had a simple, no-nonsense approach: If a death resulted from a willful violation, it should be referred to the Justice Department without delay.
But in the early days of the Reagan administration, he said in a recent interview, that policy brought a clear rebuke from OSHA's new political appointees. Twelve times he sought prosecutions. "They were all thrown out." Soon after, he said, he was removed from his job and transferred so often that he ended up living in a tent to avoid moving his family again.
"We wanted to stop people from killing," said Mr. McCann, now retired. "We wanted to make an example of those few people who do so much harm to society for their own personal gain."
But Reagan's biggest impact on OSHA may have come from an action that wasn't directly targeted at OSHA at all -- the firing of the PATCO strikers. OSHA was only created, and only survives today (such as it is) due to the influence of the American labor movement -- both directly through lobbying OSHA, Congress or the President -- and indirectly, through electing worker-friendly politicians. By declaring war on PATCO and the entire labor movement, Reagan gave the green light to American business to declare war on workers and unions. We're still feeling the effects of that war today in the form of a weaker labor movement, unending attacks on workers' rights, compensation and benefits, and a weaker OSHA.
Research: Some actions had longer term implications as AFT's Darryl Alexander points out
One of the most chilling things was the suppression of Department of Health and Human Services research on healthcare, disease and the health status of the population. The administration wouldn't release data and literally stopped collecting information on important indicators. The postulate: No data; no problem. Seems like a tradition that is followed today.
Training Grants: One of the most significant accomplishments of Eula Bingham’s administration at OSHA was the development of “New Directions” training grants. Money was provided to unions, COSH groups, universities and other non-profit organizations, generally for a period of five years, to develop a self-sustaining program to provide training and develop training materials for workers. During Bingham’s administration, OSHA funding reached almost $14 million (in addition to several million provided by the National Cancer Institute.) In Reagan’s first budget, the funding for the worker training grants was cut in half, while funding for “consultation programs” was increased. Worker training funding did not regain its previous funding levels until midway through the Clinton administration, over 15 years later. (Currently, the Bush administration is again attempting to slash funding for worker training programs.)
Voluntary Protection Program: Consistent with his desire to increase “voluntary” actions by employers, Auchter created the Voluntary Protection Program which offered employers with exemplary safety programs freedom from general schedule inspections. Although employees could still file complaints and request inspections, critics objected to the exemption from general inspections and the resources that the new program would require. Since then, the number and variety OSHA’s voluntary programs have mushroomed, sucking up an increasing portion of OSHA’s limited resources.
Peter Infante reminds me of a rather Freudian "typo" in the Federal Register containing the final Ethylene Oxide standard:
If you can find a 1982 Code of Federal Regulations, a footnote indicates that the toxic level for ethylene oxide in the workplace was "1 Ronald Reagan." This typo was appropriate.
Today, even more than in the 1980's, American workers are feeling the effects of that anti-regulatory atmosphere that Ronald Reagan did so much to promote. Only today, the situation is worse because the anti-government, anti-worker zealots have learned to be much more subtle when they undermine worker protections. As bad as the Reagan years were, career civil servants claim that the current Bush administration is much worse.
Indeed, Ronald Reagan's "regulatory reform," based on his interpretation of "liberty" as the freedom for employers to do what they want, when they want, to whom they want, doomed countless working people to preventable injury, illness and death. He may have done it with style and with a smile, but the damage was the same. That is the real legacy of Ronald Reagan.
Finally, although this article focuses solely on OSHA, I can't end it without providing some assistance to those of you trying to steer through rhetorical trash strewn about the land by the media over the past couple of weeks. This is from Atrios:
RUSSERT: One other political point: The Republicans achieved control of the United States Congress for the first time in 70 years, of both houses, under Ronald Reagan.
Look, I'm fine with the Peggy Noonan footworshipping. I'm fine with all the "Reagan destroyed the Soviet Union singlehandedly" nonsense. I'm fine with all of these types of things because they're opinions. Some are silly opinions, and there should be some balance to them, but they are still opinions.
What I'm not fine with is all the factual errors that creep into the coverage by supposedly "unbiased" reporters.
The House and Senate did not both come under Republican rule during Reagan's time.
The Berlin Wall did not come down when Reagan was in office.
Reagan is not the president who left office with the highest approval rating in modern times.
Reagan was not "the most popular president ever."
Reagan did not preside over the longest economic expansion in history.
Reagan did not shrink the size of government.
Reagan did preside over what was at the time the "biggest tax cut in history" but it was almost instantly followed up by the "biggest tax increase in history."
Reagan was not "beloved by all." He was loved by some, liked by some, and hated by some with good reason.
Those concerned about the safety and health of Americans who go to work every day believing in their freedom to come home alive and healthy have good reason to hate Ronald Reagan.
/div>DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this Blog are my own and do not, in any way, shape or form, reflect or represent the views or policies of my employer. Links to or from other websites of individuals or organizations do not constitute an endorsement of these views.