| Confined Space |
I have three pictures side by side in my house: John L. Lewis, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Jesus. I draw Social Security on account of FDR. I draw a pension on account of John L. Lewis, and I'm going to Heaven because of Jesus.
-- Jack McReynolds, 70, retired miner, West Frankfort, KY
AFL-CIO Now News From The AFL-CIO Altercation By the Nation's Eric Alterman Blue Collar Blog Firefighter, IAFF Member and CWA Staffer Sounds Off Chris Mooney The politics of science Communicate or Die American Labor Unions and the Internet Crooks and Liars Political hypocrisy n The small screen Daily Kos A must read for all political junkies DMI Blog Politics, Policy and the American Dream Edwize The blog of New York's United Federation of Teachers Effect Measure A forum for progressive public health discussion FireDogLake A Group Political Blog -- Always Something Interesting GoozNews Who's Watching Now That The Cameras Have Left? Gulf Coast Reconstruction Watch SHOCKED that there's corporate influence on public health policy? Impact Analysis A portal for your adventure in environmental health Liberal Oasis On a mission to reclaim the good name of liberals because America was founded on liberal beliefs of freedom and justice for all. MaxSpeak Economics deciphered by "Max" Sawicky Mine Safety Watch Health and Safety in the Mines Mother Jones On Top Of The News Nathan Newman Politics, economics and labor issues Political Animal Keeping up on Washington Politics by veteran blogger Kevin Drum The Pump Handle A water cooler for the public health crowd rawblogXport Labor news Seeing the Forest ...for the trees: A Political Blog Sirotablog David Sirota's online magazine of political news & commentary for those who really can't get enough politics Stayin' Alive Discussion of public health and health care policy, from a public health perspective. Suburban Guerrilla Wit, wisdom and politics by a reformed journalist Talking Points In-depth politics by Josh Marshall Tapped A group blog from the writers of the American Prospect Tom Tomorrow Politics and passion from the cartoonist Workers Comp Insider Good and fairly enlighted resource Working Immigrants The business of immigrant work: employment, compensation, legal protections, education, mobility, and public policy. Working Life By a veteran labor and economics writer Jonathan Tasini The Yorkshire Ranter The scene from across the ocean You Are Worth More Labor issues in the retail trades
Hazards Magazine Deceit and Denial eLCOSH (Electronic Library of Safety & Health) NYCOSH COSH Network UCLA-Labor Occupational Safety and Health Program (LOSH) A Job To Die For ILO Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety Grist Magazine Drum Major Institute For Public Policy International Right To Know Campaign Labor Occupational Health Program (UC Berkeley) Maquiladora Healthand Safety Support Network OSHA Worker Page NIOSH Canadian Center for Occupational Safety and Health ACT Workcover (Australia) Health & Safety Executive (Britain) Worksafe British Columbia United Support & Memorial For Workplace Fatalities US Labor Against the War LaborNotes Labor Arts The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 The Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
AFL-CIO United Electrical Workers (UE) AFSCME AFSCME DC 37 United Auto Workers Center to Protect Workers Rights Communications Workers (CWA) Laborers LabourStart ICEM
|
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
PERMALINK Posted
11:22 PM
by Jordan
"Democracy" In Action; Or "Why Washington Drives Me Crazy"Even though I blog almost exclusively about workplace safety and labor issues, I follow all Washington politics very carefully. I manage to get most of my frustration out by writing Confined Space, but occasionally life in DC gets so overwhelming that I even have to write about general politics. This is what's making me rip up the newspapers and throw things at the radio lately. Example 1: You may have heard that the Republicans lost a vote today on approving oil drilling in Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Now, if you're not following this issue carefully, you might assume this was a regular up and down vote. Not even close. First, most controversial legislation needs 60 votes to pass in the Senate because Senators can filibuster (talk indefinitely), and 60 votes are needed to shut it down for a vote. But the Republicans couldn't muster 60 votes, so they came up with something else: attach it to the budget bill whcih can't be filibustered. But they couldn't even get 50 votes for that, so they tried tactic number 3 (courtesy of Alaska Senator Ted Stevens): Put it on the Defense appropriations bill -- and add Katrina relief to that. No one would dare vote that down, leaving our boys defenseless and Katrina victims rotting in the mold, right? Wrong again. The Senate today failed to pass a major defense appropriations bill after a Democratic-led bloc stymied it with a filibuster in an effort to force removal of a controversial provision on oil drilling in an Alaskan wildlife refuge.I'll be interested to see what they come up with next.... Example 2: The Republicans did have one victory today. Vice President allow states to impose new fees on Medicaid recipients, cut federal child-support enforcement funds, impose new work requirements on state welfare programs and squeeze student lendersPresident Bush hailed the vote as "a victory for taxpayers, fiscal restraint and responsible budgeting." Responsible budgeting? Perhaps the President is so worried about getting impeached that he's forgotten about the $56 billion tax cut last week -- conveniently separated from the budget bill so that it would be harder to do the math. But let's do the math anyway. Let's see. You cut $40 billion in spending, but then take away $56 billion in revenues -- according to my childrens' first grade math book -- that would put the budget $16 billion further in debt. I don't think even a first grader would call that "responsible budgeting." And it wasn't just any budget-increasing tax cut, it was your characteristically typical Republican budget-increasing tax cut: The Tax Policy Center, run jointly by the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, has concluded that the bottom 80 percent of households would receive 15.8 percent of the House tax cuts' benefit. The top 20 percent would receive 84.2 percent of the benefit. Households earning more than $1 million a year would get 40 percent of the tax cuts, or an average reduction of nearly $51,000.In other words, it's your basic take 'from the poor and give to the rich.' Example 3: When both the House of Representatives and the Senate pass similar bills, they go to a "Conference" of leaders of both Houses to iron out the differences. Then the bill is sent back to the House and Senate for final votes. Republicans and Democrats sit on the Conference committees. But the Republicans just invented something new. The pharmaceutical companies have been trying to pass a bill that protects vaccine manufacturers from product liability claims in the event of an Avian flu pandemic. But there wasn't enough support. So the Republicans added it to the fiscal year 2006 Defense Department spending conference report -- after after House and Senate negotiators had already signed the conference report and announced its details to the public (more here). That's it for you "Democracy In Action" lesson for today. And yes, this will all be on the final exam, November 7, 2006. Go To My Main Page
| | |||||||||