Confined Space
News and Commentary on Workplace Health & Safety, Labor and Politics

Tuesday, January 09, 2007


OSHA: The Next 35 Years -- What Would You Do?

Let's project ourselves into the future a bit. Suppose a labor-friendly Democratic president is elected in two years, along with a Congress with strong, liberal Democratic majorities who vow to make sure that OSHA fulfills its promise to ensure safe workplaces for all American workers. What would you do? That's the question that Michael Silverstein has been tackling for the past several months, and as George Washington University Professor David Michaels explains, you have a chance to weigh in:
For the last several months, Michael Silverstein has been talking with safety and health activists and professionals around the country, evaluating the work of OSHA over the last 35 years and discussing ways to ensure that OSHA's promise - a safe workplace for all American workers - is fulfilled. (Michael, in case you don't know him, has an extensive background in OSHA policy. He has served head of the Washington State OSHA program, Director of Policy for federal OSHA and the UAW's Assistant Director for Occupational Health and Safety.)

Michael has completed a draft of his paper "Getting Home Safe and Sound? OSHA at Thirty-Five” and we have posted it on the website of the Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy (SKAPP).

SKAPP began this project last year in order to examine ways we can improve our system of protecting worker health and safety. With the political changes that occurred in November, it is even more pressing now for us to consider ways to improve our dysfunctional safety and health regulatory system.

So we are attempting an experiment. We at SKAPP have decided to launch a national electronic discussion of Michael's paper, and especially its recommendations. As a forum, we're using the new blog "The Pump Handle". If you go to you can read a letter from Michael describing the project and by posting a comment, you can participate in the discussion.

If you have thoughts on how to improve the workings of OSHA, please jump into the discussion (and circulate this information to your members, colleagues and friends).

David Michaels, PhD, MPH
Director, The Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy
I encourage you all -- whether you're a health and safety professional, or a worker, or a family member of an worker injured or killed on the job -- to read Michael's paper and let him know what you think. As he says (and you all know), OSHA has lots of problems, despite the progress that has been made:
However, after 35 years much is left undone. A worker still becomes injured or ill on job every 2.5 seconds and these injuries and illnesses have disproportionate, unfair impact in especially high risk industries and among groups of disadvantaged workers.

Most workplaces are inspected so infrequently and most penalties for violations of the OSHAct are so small that most employers have little incentive to pay much attention to OSHA requirements. Acts of gross negligence or criminal behavior leading to workplace deaths regularly go unpunished. Employees are discouraged from raising complaints about workplace hazards because the OSHAct provides insufficient protections from discrimination. And millions of public employees are left without the enforceable protections of the OSHAct entirely.

Long after Congress declared safe and healthful workplaces to be a national priority more attention is paid and more resources are devoted to fish and wildlife protection than worker safety. Lives on the job are devalued by this violation of a national promise.

Working to earn a living, to support a family, to build the community has been disrespected and dishonored. We have the technology, the legal framework and the moral capacity to do significantly better. We can reach higher by making more creative use of the existing provisions in the OSHAct, by strengthening the Act itself, and by taking steps entirely outside the OSHAct framework to ensure that those who contribute their labor for their families and communities are honored by returning home safe and sound every day.

Read Michael Silverstein's draft paper "Getting Home Safe and Sound? OSHA at Thirty-Five"

Leave comments here (scroll to the bottom)

Labels: ,




Go To My Main Page

Google Groups Subscribe to Confined Space
Email:
Browse Archives at groups.google.com




Google
Search WWW Search Confined Space

/div>

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this Blog are my own and do not, in any way, shape or form, reflect or represent the views or policies of my employer. Links to or from other websites of individuals or organizations do not constitute an endorsement of these views.
Looking for Confined Space Safety Information?
Click Here

Google
Search Web Search Confined Space

Greatest Hits


BP Texas City Explosion Stories

2006 Mine Disaster Stories

Popcorn Lung Stories

Speech on Receiving the APHA Lorin Kerr Award
by Jordan Barab, November 9, 2004


Acts of God, Acts of Man," by Jordan Barab, Working USA

Lies, Partisanship Caused Ergo Standard to Crumble, by Jordan Barab, Safety + Health, February 2002

A Week of Death, by Jordan Barab, Hazards, February 5, 2003

Archives


March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007

Recent Posts



FINALIST

Koufax Award

For Best Single Issue Blog of 2003 and 2004